BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.38919.681563.4F, (Published 4 August 2006)

RESEARCH

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination for detection of non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy: cross sectional analytic study

Natasha Nassar ^1*, Christine L Roberts ¹, Carolyn A Cameron ¹, Emily C Olive ¹

¹ Centre for Perinatal Health Services Research, School of Public Health, University of Sydney NSW 2006, Australia

^* Correspondence to: natashan{at}ichr.uwa.edu.au.

Objective To examine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical examination to determine fetal presentation in late pregnancy.

Design Cross sectional analytic study with index test of clinical examination and reference standard of ultrasonography.

Setting Antenatal clinic in tertiary obstetric hospital in Sydney, Australia.

Participants 1633 women with a singleton pregnancy between 35 and 37 weeks' gestation attending antenatal clinics.

Intervention Fetal presentation assessed by clinical examination during routine antenatal care, followed by ultrasonography to confirm the diagnosis.

Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of clinical examination compared with ultrasonography. Diagnostic rates by maternal characteristics.

Results Ultrasonography identified non-cephalic presentation in 130 (8%) women, comprising 103 (6.3%) with breech and 27 (1.7%) with transverse or oblique lie. Sensitivity of clinical examination for detecting non-cephalic presentation was 70% (95% confidence interval 62% to 78%) and specificity was 95% (94% to 96%). The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were55% and 97%, respectively.

Conclusions Clinical examination is not sensitive enough for detection and timely management of non-cephalic presentation.

---

(Accepted 29 June 2006)
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Clinical examination for non-cephalic presentation: Royal College of Midwives' response to research

Sue Macdonald
BMJ 2006 333: 705. [Extract] [Full Text]

Clinical examination for non-cephalic presentation: External cephalic version should be a maternity service quality indicator

Stephanie Kuku and Susan Bewley
BMJ 2006 333: 705-706. [Extract] [Full Text]

Palpation is poor at spotting non-cephalic presentation
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text]

Non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy

James M Nicholson
BMJ 2006 333: 562-563. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study • Commentary: Obstetric morbidity data and the need to evaluate thromboembolic disease

Mark Waterstone, Susan Bewley, Charles Wolfe, and Deirdre J Murphy
BMJ 2001 322: 1089-1094. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 2: predictive values

Douglas G Altman and J Martin Bland
BMJ 1994 309: 102. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Young, G. (2007). Clinical examination had poor sensitivity for detecting non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy. Evid. Based Med. 12: 54-54 [Full text]  
• (2006). Don't Trust Palpation -- It Might Be a Fetal Lie. JWatch Women's Health 2006: 3-3 [Full text]  
• Macdonald, S. (2006). Clinical examination for non-cephalic presentation: Royal College of Midwives' response to research.. BMJ 333: 705-705 [Full text]  
• Kuku, S., Bewley, S. (2006). Clinical examination for non-cephalic presentation: external cephalic version should be a maternity service quality indicator.. BMJ 333: 705-706 [Full text]  
• Nicholson, J. M (2006). Non-cephalic presentation in late pregnancy. BMJ 333: 562-563 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

inconclusive

penny a price
bmj.com, 6 Aug 2006 [Full text]

What does this study add?

Elizabeth Collins
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Handheld Dopplers Can Rule Out Breech

Veronica G. (Ronnie) Falcao
bmj.com, 9 Aug 2006 [Full text]

RCM response on clinical examination technique

Sue Macdonald
bmj.com, 10 Aug 2006 [Full text]

Diagnosing Breech at Term

Neil F. Moran
bmj.com, 15 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Use of ECV should be a maternity service quality indicator

Stephanie Y Kuku, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Kappa calculation

Soe-nyunt Aung, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Sep 2006 [Full text]

Clinical examination for non-cephalic presentation: training and experience can make a difference

Natasha Nassar, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Oct 2006 [Full text]

Doctors do not dichotomise

Marjolein Kok, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Nov 2006 [Full text]

Confidence Intervals in the Table are Wrong

Thomas B. Newman
bmj.com, 24 Aug 2007 [Full text]