BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.38887.558576.7C, (Published 21 July 2006)

RESEARCH

A cost effectiveness analysis within a randomised controlled trial of post-acute care of older people in a community hospital

Jacqueline O'Reilly 1, Karin Lowson 1*, John Young 2, Anne Forster 2, John Green 2, Neil Small 3

1 York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5NH
2 Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, St Luke's Hospital, Bradford
3 School of Health Studies, University of Bradford

* Correspondence to: kvl2{at}york.ac.uk.

Objective To assess the cost effectiveness of post-acute care for older people in a locality based community hospital compared with a department for care of elderly people in a district general hospital, which admits patients aged over 76 years with acute medical conditions.

Design Cost effectiveness analysis within a randomised controlled trial.

Setting Community hospital and district general hospital in Yorkshire, England.

Participants 220 patients needing rehabilitation after an acute illness for which they required admission to hospital.

Interventions Multidisciplinary care in the district general hospital or prompt transfer to the community hospital.

Main outcome measures EuroQol EQ-5D scores transformed into quality adjusted life years (QALYs), and health and social service costs over six months from randomisation.

Results The mean QALY score for the community hospital group was marginally non-significantly higher than that for the district general hospital group (0.38 v 0.35) at six months after recruitment. The mean (standard deviation) costs per patient of the health and social services resources used were similar for both groups: community hospital group £7233 (euros 10 567; $13 341) (£5031), district general hospital group £7351 (£6229), and these findings were robust to several sensitivity analyses. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio for community hospital care dominated. A cost effectiveness acceptability curve, based on bootstrapped simulations, suggests that at a willingness to pay threshold of £10 000 per QALY, 51% of community hospital cases will be cost effective, which rises to 53% of cases when the threshold is £30 000 per QALY.

Conclusion Post-acute care for older people in a locality based community hospital is of similar cost effectiveness to that of an elderly care department in a district general hospital.


(Accepted 22 May 2006)

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Community hospitals are cost effective for post-acute care of elderly patients
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text]

Effects of locality based community hospital care on independence in older people needing rehabilitation: randomised controlled trial
John Green, John Young, Anne Forster, Karen Mallinder, Sue Bogle, Karin Lowson, and Neil Small
BMJ 2005 331: 317-322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Therapeutic nursing or unblocking beds? A randomised controlled trial of a post-acute intermediate care unit Commentary: Problems with randomised consent Authors' reply
Andrea Steiner, Bronagh Walsh, Ruth M Pickering, Rose Wiles, Jilly Ward, Julia I Brooking, and David J Torgerson
BMJ 2001 322: 453-460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • O'reilly, J., Lowson, K., Green, J., Young, J. B., Forster, A. (2008). Post-acute care for older people in community hospitals--a cost-effectiveness analysis within a multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Age Ageing 0: afn120v1-afn120 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Broad economic perspective and excluding informal care: contradiction in terms
Bernard Van den Berg
bmj.com, 30 Jul 2006 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Intimate examinations

Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview