BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.38874.652569.55, (Published 27 June 2006)

RESEARCH

Psychological interventions to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Kirsty Winkley ¹, Sabine Landau ², Ivan Eisler ³, Khalida Ismail ^1*

¹ Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London SE5 9RJ
² Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
³ Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London

^* Correspondence to: khalida.ismail{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk.

Objective To determine whether psychological interventions have any effect on glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes.

Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological therapies to assess their effectiveness in improving glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes.

Data sources Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, and Cochrane central register of controlled trials searched to September 2004.

Review methods All included studies were randomised controlled trials in children (including adolescents) or adults with type 1 diabetes that evaluated the effect of a psychological therapy (counselling, cognitive behaviour therapy, family systems therapy, and psychodynamic therapy) on control of diabetes. Data were extracted on sample size, age, duration of diabetes, type of psychological therapy, its mode of delivery, and type of intervention in control group.

Main outcome measures Glycaemic control measured by percentage of glycated haemoglobin and psychological distress. Pooled standardised effect sizes were calculated.

Results 29 trials were eligible for the systematic review and 21 trials for the meta-analysis. In the 10 studies of children and adolescents included in the meta-analysis, the mean percentage of glycated haemoglobin was significantly reduced in those who had received a psychological intervention compared with those in the control group (pooled standardised mean difference -0.35 (95% confidence interval -0.66 to -0.04), equivalent to a 0.48% (0.05% to 0.91%) absolute reduction in glycated haemoglobin. In the 11 studies in adults the pooled standardised mean difference was -0.17 (-0.45 to 0.10), equivalent to 0.22% (-0.13% to 0.56%) absolute reduction in glycated haemoglobin. Psychological distress was significantly lower in the intervention groups in children and adolescents (pooled standardised effect size -0.46, -0.83 to -0.10) but not in adults (-0.25, -0.51 to 0.01).

Conclusion Psychological treatments can slightly improve glycaemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes but have no effect in adults.

---

(Accepted 13 April 2006)
CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Psychological treatments improve glycaemic control in children and adolescents with diabetes
BMJ 2006 333: 0. [Full Text]

Support for young people with diabetes

Carine de Beaufort and Peter Swift
BMJ 2006 333: 55-56. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider, and Christoph Minder
BMJ 1997 315: 629-634. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Fisher, E. B., Thorpe, C. T., DeVellis, B. M., DeVellis, R. F. (2007). Healthy Coping, Negative Emotions, and Diabetes Management: A Systematic Review and Appraisal. The Diabetes Educator 33: 1080-1103 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hood, K. K., Nansel, T. R. (2007). Commonalities in Effective Behavioral Interventions for Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: A Review of Reviews. Diabetes Spectr. 20: 251-254 [Full text]  
• Cameron, F. J., Northam, E. A., Ambler, G. R., Daneman, D. (2007). Routine Psychological Screening in Youth With Type 1 Diabetes and Their Parents: A notion whose time has come?. Diabetes Care 30: 2716-2724 [Full text]  
• Simmons, D., Lillis, S., Swan, J., Haar, J. (2007). Discordance in Perceptions of Barriers to Diabetes Care Between Patients and Primary Care and Secondary Care. Diabetes Care 30: 490-495 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2006). Other articles noted. Evid. Based Med. 11: 159-160 [Full text]  
• (2006). Can Psychological Interventions Improve Glycemic Control in Type 1 Diabetes?. JWatch General 2006: 3-3 [Full text]  
• de Beaufort, C., Swift, P. (2006). Support for young people with diabetes. BMJ 333: 55-56 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Not the magic bullet?

Frank J Snoek
bmj.com, 29 Jun 2006 [Full text]

What works for whom and why?

Khalida Ismail
bmj.com, 24 Jul 2006 [Full text]