BMJ, doi: 10.1136/bmj.37942.594456.44, (Published 26 January 2004)

PAPERS

Randomised controlled trial of effect of hands and knees posturing on incidence of occiput posterior position at birth

Azar Kariminia 1, Marie E Chamberlain 2, John Keogh 3, Agnes Shea 2

1 Midwifery Research, Hornsby Hospital, Palmerston Road, Hornsby, NSW 2077, Australia
2 University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hornsby Hospital

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of hands and knees position and pelvic rocking exercises on the incidence of fetal occiput posterior position at birth.

Design Multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Setting Seven maternity units in New South Wales, Australia, encompassing teaching hospitals and district general hospitals.

Participants 2547 pregnant women at 37 weeks' gestation; 1292 randomised to the intervention group and 1255 to the control group.

Intervention Hands and knees position and pelvic rocking exercises from 37 weeks' gestation until the onset of labour.

Main outcome measure Incidence of fetal occiput posterior position at birth.

Results 1046 women in the intervention group and 1209 women in the control group remained in the study until they went into labour. No significant difference existed between the groups for the incidence of occiput posterior position at birth: 105 (8.1%) women in the intervention group and 98 (7.8%) in the control group had a baby in a posterior position at delivery (difference in risk 0.3%, 95% confidence interval -1.8 to 2.4). The incidence of fetal transverse arrest was 3.4% (44 women) in the intervention group and 3.0% (38 women) in the control group (difference in risk 0.4, -1 to 1.7). No differences occurred between intervention and control groups for induction of labour, use of epidural, duration of labour, mode of delivery, use of episiotomy, or Apgar score.

Conclusion Hands and knees exercise with pelvic rocking from 37 weeks' gestation to the onset of labour did not reduce the incidence of persistent occiput posterior position at birth.


(Accepted 7 November 2003)

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Confidence intervals illuminate absence of evidence
Doug Altman and J Martin Bland
BMJ 2004 328: 1016-1017. [Extract] [Full Text]

Pelvic rocking exercise does not help the baby to rotate
BMJ 2004 328: 0. [Full Text]

What doesn't work and how to show it
Phil Alderson and Trish Groves
BMJ 2004 328: 473. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Altman, D., Bland, J M. (2004). Confidence intervals illuminate absence of evidence. BMJ 328: 1016-1017 [Full text]  
  • Alderson, P., Groves, T. (2004). What doesn't work and how to show it. BMJ 328: 473-473 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

interesting article
Susan Hughes
bmj.com, 12 Mar 2004 [Full text]
Validity is flawed - what about the laws of gravity and bouyancy?
Sara S Webb, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Apr 2004 [Full text]
We need more trials like this, but
Karen Leitzel
bmj.com, 21 Oct 2004 [Full text]
Help for the posterior baby
Esther Marilus
bmj.com, 9 Mar 2007 [Full text]



Student BMJ

Asylum seekers' care

UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care

www.student.bmj.com

Listen to the latest BMJ Interview