Published 17 September 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3450
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3450

Research

Understanding why some ethnic minority patients evaluate medical care more negatively than white patients: a cross sectional analysis of a routine patient survey in English general practices

¹ NIHR School for Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, ² General Practice and Primary Care Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR

Objective To examine why patients from ethnic minorities give poorer evaluations of primary health care than white patients.

Design Cross sectional analysis of patient surveys collected in general practice.

Setting 1098 English general practices that undertook a routine survey of patients using the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire between April 2005 and March 2006.

Participants 188 572 survey respondents, 95.8% of whom identified themselves as "white," "black/black British," "Asian/Asian British," or "Chinese." Analyses were restricted to between 133 441 (71%) and 147 686 (78%) respondents with complete data on relevant variables.

Main outcome measures Patient evaluations of waiting times for general practitioner appointments, time spent waiting in surgeries for consultations to start, and continuity of care.

Results All aspects of care were rated substantially lower by respondents from the three ethnic minority groups than by white patients. Poorer evaluations of time spent waiting for consultations to begin (rated lowest by Asian patients) and continuity of care (rated lowest by Chinese patients) appeared to reflect worse reported experiences by ethnic minority groups. Substantial differences between white and ethnic minority patients’ ratings of appointment waiting times persisted, however, even after adjusting for the actual time patients reported waiting. This effect disappeared for Chinese and black respondents after adjusting for evaluations of reception staff and doctors’ communication skills, but Asian patients’ ratings remained considerably lower than those of white respondents.

Conclusions Important differences in assessments of care exist in different ethnic minority groups. Some negative evaluations may reflect communication issues. Among Asian patients, lower ratings of waiting times for appointments may also reflect different expectations of care. Adjusting survey results for ethnicity may be justified when comparing healthcare providers; however, health services also have a responsibility to meet legitimate patient expectations.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Using patient experience within pay for performance programmes

Chris Salisbury
BMJ 2009 339: b4224. [Extract] [Full Text]

What about doctor factors?

Claire L Morgan and Hendrik J Beerstecher
BMJ 2009 339: b4060. [Extract] [Full Text]

Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England

Martin Roland, Marc Elliott, Georgios Lyratzopoulos, Josephine Barbiere, Richard A Parker, Patten Smith, Peter Bower, and John Campbell
BMJ 2009 339: b3851. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Ethnic minorities and their perceptions of the quality of primary care

Aziz Sheikh
BMJ 2009 339: b3797. [Extract] [Full Text]

Patients' own assessments of quality of primary care compared with objective records based measures of technical quality of care: cross sectional study

Mala Rao, Aileen Clarke, Colin Sanderson, and Richard Hammersley
BMJ 2006 333: 19. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Metronidazole is used for antibiotic associated diarrhoea in pregnancy in UK

Scott Pegler and Patricia McElhatton
BMJ 2002 325: 903. [Extract] [Full Text]

Describing race, ethnicity, and culture in medical research

Kwame McKenzie and N S Crowcroft
BMJ 1996 312: 1054. [Extract] [Full Text]

Ethnicity as a variable in epidemiological research

P A Senior and R Bhopal
BMJ 1994 309: 327-330. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Salisbury, C. (2009). Using patient experience within pay for performance programmes. BMJ 339: b4224-b4224 [Full text]  
• Morgan, C. L, Beerstecher, H. J (2009). What about doctor factors?. BMJ 339: b4060-b4060 [Full text]  
• Roland, M., Elliott, M., Lyratzopoulos, G., Barbiere, J., Parker, R. A, Smith, P., Bower, P., Campbell, J. (2009). Reliability of patient responses in pay for performance schemes: analysis of national General Practitioner Patient Survey data in England. BMJ 339: b3851-b3851 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Sheikh, A. (2009). Ethnic minorities and their perceptions of the quality of primary care. BMJ 339: b3797-b3797 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Physician factors

Claire L Morgan, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Oct 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>