Published 26 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3794
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3794

Research

Trends in Down’s syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008: analysis of data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register

¹ Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ

Objectives To describe trends in the numbers of Down’s syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008.

Design and setting The National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register holds details of 26488 antenatal and postnatal diagnoses of Down’s syndrome made by all cytogenetic laboratories in England and Wales since 1989.

Interventions Antenatal screening, diagnosis, and subsequent termination of Down’s syndrome pregnancies.

Main outcome measures The number of live births with Down’s syndrome.

Results Despite the number of births in 1989/90 being similar to that in 2007/8, antenatal and postnatal diagnoses of Down’s syndrome increased by 71% (from 1075 in 1989/90 to 1843 in 2007/8). However, numbers of live births with Down’s syndrome fell by 1% (752 to 743; 1.10 to 1.08 per 1000 births) because of antenatal screening and subsequent terminations. In the absence of such screening, numbers of live births with Down’s syndrome would have increased by 48% (from 959 to 1422), since couples are starting families at an older age. Among mothers aged 37 years and older, a consistent 70% of affected pregnancies were diagnosed antenatally. In younger mothers, the proportions of pregnancies diagnosed antenatally increased from 3% to 43% owing to improvements in the availability and sensitivity of screening tests.

Conclusions Since 1989, expansion of and improvements in antenatal screening have offset an increase in Down’s syndrome resulting from rising maternal age. The proportion of antenatal diagnoses has increased most strikingly in younger women, whereas that in older women has stayed relatively constant. This trend suggests that, even with future improvements in screening, a large number of births with Down’s syndrome are still likely, and that monitoring of the numbers of babies born with Down’s syndrome is essential to ensure adequate provision for their needs.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Impact of a new national screening policy for Down’s syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study

Charlotte K Ekelund, Finn Stener Jørgensen, Olav Bjørn Petersen, Karin Sundberg, Ann Tabor Danish Fetal Medicine Research Group
BMJ 2008 337: a2547. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Congenital anomaly surveillance in England—ascertainment deficiencies in the national system

P A Boyd, B Armstrong, H Dolk, B Botting, S Pattenden, L Abramsky, J Rankin, M Vrijheid, and D Wellesley
BMJ 2005 330: 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Results of first year (1989) of a national register of Down's syndrome in England and Wales.

D E Mutton, E Alberman, R Ide, and M Bobrow
BMJ 1991 303: 1295-1297. [Abstract] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2009). Stability of U.K. Down Syndrome Birth Rate: Age-Related Risks Offset by Antenatal Screening. JWatch Women's Health 2009: 2-2 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Down Syndrome Research that makes sense.

Peter F. Elliott
bmj.com, 29 Oct 2009 [Full text]

Time to do the right thing

Rona M Hamilton
bmj.com, 30 Oct 2009 [Full text]

Informed choice in prenatal screening should matter for both acceptors and decliners

Janka Koschack, PhD
bmj.com, 30 Oct 2009 [Full text]

Down Syndrome Diagnosis

Glen Fletcher
bmj.com, 31 Oct 2009 [Full text]

He's a child first!

Joanne L Jeyes
bmj.com, 1 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Response from a GP

Marga G hogenboom
bmj.com, 5 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Think differently

Lorna I Watson
bmj.com, 9 Nov 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>