Published 6 October 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3829
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3829

Research

Prognosis for patients with chronic low back pain: inception cohort study

Luciola da C Menezes Costa, PhD candidate1, Christopher G Maher, director of division1, James H McAuley, research manager1,2, Mark J Hancock, lecturer2, Robert D Herbert, associate professor1, Kathryn M Refshauge, professor2, Nicholas Henschke, postdoctoral fellow1

1 George Institute for International Health, University of Sydney, 2 Back Pain Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney

Correspondence to: L da C Menezes Costa, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, NSW 2050, Australia lmenezes{at}george.org.au

Objectives To describe the course of chronic low back pain in an inception cohort and to identify prognostic markers at the onset of chronicity.

Design Inception cohort study with one year follow-up.

Setting Primary care clinics in Sydney, Australia.

Participants The study sample was a subcohort of an inception cohort of 973 consecutive patients presenting to primary care with acute low back pain (<2 weeks’ duration). 406 participants whose pain persisted for three months formed the inception cohort of patients with chronic low back pain.

Main outcome measures Outcomes and putative predictors measured at initial presentation, onset of chronicity (study entry), and follow-up at nine and 12 months. Recovery was determined from measures of pain intensity, disability, and work status. The association between potential prognostic factors and time to recovery was modelled with Cox regression.

Results Completeness of follow-up was 97% of total person time for all outcomes. The cumulative probability of being pain-free was 35% at nine months and 42% at 12 months and for complete recovery was 35% at nine months and 41% at 12 months. Of the 259 participants who had not recovered from pain related disability at entry to the chronic study, 47% had recovered by 12 months. Previous sick leave due to low back pain, high disability levels or high pain intensity at onset of chronicity, low levels of education, greater perceived risk of persistent pain, and being born outside Australia were associated with delayed recovery.

Conclusion More than one third of patients with recent onset, non-radicular chronic low back pain recover within 12 months. The prognosis is less favourable for those who have taken previous sick leave for low back pain, have high disability levels or high pain intensity at onset of chronic low back pain, have lower education, perceive themselves as having a high risk of persistent pain, and were born outside Australia.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Prognosis of low back pain in primary care
Elaine M Hay and Kate M Dunn
BMJ 2009 339: b3694. [Extract] [Full Text]

Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study
Nicholas Henschke, Christopher G Maher, Kathryn M Refshauge, Robert D Herbert, Robert G Cumming, Jane Bleasel, John York, Anurina Das, and James H McAuley
BMJ 2008 337: a171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

The logrank test
J Martin Bland and Douglas G Altman
BMJ 2004 328: 1073. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis
Liset H M Pengel, Robert D Herbert, Chris G Maher, and Kathryn M Refshauge
BMJ 2003 327: 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables
Douglas G Altman
BMJ 2001 323: 224-228. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Outcome of low back pain in general practice: a prospective study
Peter R Croft, Gary J Macfarlane, Ann C Papageorgiou, Elaine Thomas, and Alan J Silman
BMJ 1998 316: 1356-1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice
J Coste, G Delecoeuillerie, A Cohen de Lara, J M LeParc, and J B Paolaggi
BMJ 1994 308: 577-580. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Hay, E. M, Dunn, K. M (2009). Prognosis of low back pain in primary care. BMJ 339: b3694-b3694 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Waiting for tests to clinically classify chronic low back pain patients, we need better epidemiological definitions
Stefano Negrini
bmj.com, 16 Oct 2009 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ