Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 30 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2772
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2772
Lieve Van den Block, professor of communication and education in general practice, and postdoctoral researcher1,2, Reginald Deschepper, anthropologist and professor of critical care1,6, Johan Bilsen, professor of public health1,4, Nathalie Bossuyt, researcher3, Viviane Van Casteren, senior researcher3, Luc Deliens, professor of public health and palliative care1,5
1 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, End-of-Life Care Research Group, Laarbeeklaan 103, 1090 Brussels, Belgium, 2 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of General Practice, 1090 Brussels, Belgium , 3 Scientific Institute of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 1040 Brussels, Belgium , 4 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Public Health, 1090 Brussels, Belgium , 5 Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Centre, 1007 MB Amsterdam, Netherlands , 6 Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Department of Critical Care, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
Correspondence to: L Van den Block lvdblock{at}vub.ac.be
Design Two year nationwide retrospective study, 2005-6 (SENTI-MELC study).
Setting Data collection via the sentinel network of general practitioners, an epidemiological surveillance system representative of all general practitioners in Belgium.
Subjects 1690 non-sudden deaths in practices of the sentinel general practitioners.
Main outcome measures Non-sudden deaths of patients (aged >1 year) reported each week. Reported care provided in the final three months of life and the end of life decisions made. Multivariable regression analysis controlled for age, sex, cause, and place of death.
Results Use of specialist multidisciplinary palliative care services was associated with intensified alleviation of symptoms (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.6 to 2.6), continuous deep sedation forgoing food/fluid (2.9, 1.7 to 4.9), and the total of decisions explicitly intended to shorten life (1.5, 1.1 to 2.1) but not with euthanasia or physician assisted suicide in particular. To a large extent receiving spiritual care was associated with higher frequencies of euthanasia or physician assisted suicide than receiving little spiritual care (18.5, 2.0 to 172.7).
Conclusions End of life decisions that shorten life, including euthanasia or physician assisted suicide, are not related to a lower use of palliative care in Belgium and often occur within the context of multidisciplinary care.
© Block et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses