Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 22 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2810
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2810
Gudrun Boysen, professor of neurology1, Lars-Henrik Krarup, PhD student1,6, Xianrong Zeng, neurologist2, Adam Oskedra, neurologist3, Janika Kõrv, neurologist4, Grethe Andersen, neurologist5, Christian Gluud, head of Copenhagen Trial Unit6, Anders Pedersen, study nurse1, Marianne Lindahl, physiotherapist1, Lotte Hansen, physiotherapist1, Per Winkel, statistical adviser6, Thomas Truelsen, neurologist1, for the ExStroke Pilot Trial Group
1 Department of Neurology, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen NV, Denmark, 2 Department of Neurology, Sichuan Provincial Peoples Hospital, Chengdu, China, 3 Department of Neurology, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warsaw, Poland, 4 Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of Tartu, Estonia, 5 Department of Neurology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, 6 Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital
Correspondence to: G Boysen gb01{at}bbh.regionh.dk
Design Multicentre, multinational, randomised clinical trial with masked outcome assessment.
Setting Stroke units in Denmark, China, Poland, and Estonia.
Participants 314 patients with ischaemic stroke aged
40 years who were able to walk—157 (mean age 69.7 years) randomised to the intervention, 157 (mean age 69.4 years) in the control group.
Interventions Patients randomised to the intervention were instructed in a detailed training programme before discharge and at five follow-up visits during 24 months. Control patients had follow-up visits with the same frequency but without instructions in physical activity.
Main outcome measures Physical activity assessed with the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) at each visit. Secondary outcomes were clinical events.
Results The estimated mean PASE scores were 69.1 in the intervention group and 64.0 in the control group (difference 5.0 (95% confidence interval –5.8 to 15.9), P=0.36. The intervention had no significant effect on mortality, recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction, or falls and fractures.
Conclusion Repeated encouragement and verbal instruction in being physically active did not lead to a significant increase in physical activity measured by the PASE score. More intensive strategies seem to be needed to promote physical activity after ischaemic stroke.
Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT00132483 [ClinicalTrials.gov]
© Boysen et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses