Published 7 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2534
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2534

Research

Health outcomes of youth development programme in England: prospective matched comparison study

Meg Wiggins, senior research officer1, Chris Bonell, senior lecturer2, Mary Sawtell, research officer1, Helen Austerberry, research officer1, Helen Burchett, research student2, Elizabeth Allen, lecturer 2, Vicki Strange, senior research officer1

1 Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London WC1H 0NR, 2 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT

Correspondence to: C Bonell chris.bonell{at}lshtm.ac.uk

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of youth development in reducing teenage pregnancy, substance use, and other outcomes.

Design Prospective matched comparison study.

Setting 54 youth service sites in England.

Participants Young people (n=2724) aged 13-15 years at baseline deemed by professionals as at risk of teenage pregnancy, substance misuse, or school exclusion or to be vulnerable.

Intervention Intensive, multicomponent youth development programme including sex and drugs education (Young People’s Development Programme) versus standard youth provision.

Main outcome measures Various, including pregnancy, weekly cannabis use, and monthly drunkenness at 18 months.

Results Young women in the intervention group more commonly reported pregnancy than did those in the comparison group (16% v 6%; adjusted odds ratio 3.55, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 9.50). Young women in the intervention group also more commonly reported early heterosexual experience (58% v 33%; adjusted odds ratio 2.53, 1.09 to 5.92) and expectation of teenage parenthood (34% v 24%; 1.61, 1.07 to 2.43).

Conclusions No evidence was found that the intervention was effective in delaying heterosexual experience or reducing pregnancies, drunkenness, or cannabis use. Some results suggested an adverse effect. Although methodological limitations may at least partly explain these findings, any further implementation of such interventions in the UK should be only within randomised trials.

© Wiggins et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Reducing pregnancy and health risk behaviours in teenagers
Douglas Kirby
BMJ 2009 339: b2054. [Extract] [Full Text]

Improving school ethos may reduce substance misuse and teenage pregnancy
C Bonell, A Fletcher, and J McCambridge
BMJ 2007 334: 614-616. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

A cognitive behavioural intervention to reduce sexually transmitted infections among gay men: randomised trial
John Imrie, Judith M Stephenson, Frances M Cowan, Shamil Wanigaratne, Andrew J P Billington, Andrew J Copas, Lesley French, Patrick D French, and Anne M Johnson
BMJ 2001 322: 1451-1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kirby, D. (2009). Reducing pregnancy and health risk behaviours in teenagers. BMJ 339: b2054-b2054 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

No respite in sight at YDP site
Rajiv Mahajan, et al.
bmj.com, 10 Jul 2009 [Full text]
Authors' response to Mahajan
Chris P Bonell
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2009 [Full text]
Evaluation of a youth development programme demonstrates the need for the randomised roll-out of community interventions
Lyndal Bond, et al.
bmj.com, 16 Jul 2009 [Full text]
Self esteem core to battle
David G Samuel
bmj.com, 19 Jul 2009 [Full text]
The case for Harm Reduction
Rudiger Pittrof, et al.
bmj.com, 23 Jul 2009 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ