Published 2 July 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2651
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b2651

Research

Public perceptions, anxiety, and behaviour change in relation to the swine flu outbreak: cross sectional telephone survey

¹ King’s College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Psychological Medicine, Weston Education Centre, London SE5 9RJ, ² Health Protection Agency, Emergency Response Department, Porton Down, Wiltshire

Objective To assess whether perceptions of the swine flu outbreak predicted changes in behaviour among members of the public in England, Scotland, and Wales.

Design Cross sectional telephone survey using random digit dialling.

Setting Interviews by telephone between 8 and 12 May.

Participants 997 adults aged 18 or more who had heard of swine flu and spoke English.

Main outcome measures Recommended change in behaviour (increases in handwashing and surface cleaning or plans made with a "flu friend") and avoidance behaviours (engaged in one or more of six behaviours such as avoiding large crowds or public transport).

Results 37.8% of participants (n=377) reported performing any recommended behaviour change "over the past four days . . . because of swine flu." 4.9% (n=49) had carried out any avoidance behaviour. Controlling for personal details and anxiety, recommended changes were associated with perceptions that swine flu is severe, that the risk of catching it is high risk, that the outbreak will continue for a long time, that the authorities can be trusted, that good information has been provided, that people can control their risk of catching swine flu, and that specific behaviours are effective in reducing the risk. Being uncertain about the outbreak and believing that the outbreak had been exaggerated were associated with a lower likelihood of change. The strongest predictor of behaviour change was ethnicity, with participants from ethnic minority groups being more likely to make recommended changes (odds ratio 3.2, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 5.3) and carry out avoidance behaviours (4.1, 2.0 to 8.4).

Conclusions The results support efforts to inform the public about specific actions that can reduce the risks from swine flu and to communicate about the government’s plans and resources. Tackling the perception that the outbreak has been "over-hyped" may be difficult but worthwhile. Additional research is required into differing reactions to the outbreak among ethnic groups.

© Rubin et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Public information needs after the poisoning of Alexander Litvinenko with polonium-210 in London: cross sectional telephone survey and qualitative analysis

G James Rubin, Lisa Page, Oliver Morgan, Richard J Pinder, Paul Riley, Stephani Hatch, Helen Maguire, Mike Catchpole, John Simpson, and Simon Wessely
BMJ 2007 335: 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Modern worries, new technology, and medicine

Keith J Petrie and Simon Wessely
BMJ 2002 324: 690-691. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hayward, A. (2009). Influenza A (H1N1) pandemic: true or false alarm. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 63: 775-776 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Swine Flu perceptions and parties.

Emmanuel Agogo
bmj.com, 5 Jul 2009 [Full text]

Swine flu parties? What parties?

Peter J Flegg
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2009 [Full text]

Namaste or handshake: Time to ponder

Malvinder S. Parmar
bmj.com, 13 Jul 2009 [Full text]

This little piggy could be something else

David G Samuel
bmj.com, 17 Jul 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>