Published 27 August 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3047
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3047

Research

Has payment by results affected the way that English hospitals provide care? Difference-in-differences analysis

Shelley Farrar, research fellow1, Deokhee Yi, research fellow1, Matt Sutton, professor in health economics2, Martin Chalkley, professor3, Jon Sussex, deputy director4, Anthony Scott, professorial research fellow5

1 Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, 2 Health Methodology Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, 3 Department of Economic Studies, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, 4 Office of Health Economics, London SW1A 2DY, 5 Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia

Correspondence to: S Farrar s.farrar{at}abdn.ac.uk

Objective To examine whether the introduction of payment by results (a fixed tariff case mix based payment system) was associated with changes in key outcome variables measuring volume, cost, and quality of care between 2003/4 and 2005/6.

Setting Acute care hospitals in England.

Design Difference-in-differences analysis (using a control group created from trusts in England and providers in Scotland not implementing payment by results in the relevant years); retrospective analysis of patient level secondary data with fixed effects models.

Data sources English hospital episode statistics and Scottish morbidity records for 2002/3 to 2005/6.

Main outcome measures Changes in length of stay and proportion of day case admissions as a proxy for unit cost; growth in number of spells to measure increases in output; and changes in in-hospital mortality, 30 day post-surgical mortality, and emergency readmission after treatment for hip fracture as measures of impact on quality of care.

Results Length of stay fell more quickly and the proportion of day cases increased more quickly where payment by results was implemented, suggesting a reduction in the unit costs of care associated with payment by results. Some evidence of an association between the introduction of payment by results and growth in acute hospital activity was found. Little measurable change occurred in the quality of care indicators used in this study that can be attributed to the introduction of payment by results.

Conclusion Reductions in unit costs may have been achieved without detrimental impact on the quality of care, at least in as far as these are measured by the proxy variables used in this study.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Has payment by results affected how care is recorded?
John P Watson
BMJ 2009 339: b3858. [Extract] [Full Text]

Market failure
Rudiger Pittrof
BMJ 2009 339: b3859. [Extract] [Full Text]

Expect the unexpected
Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2009 339: b3571. [Extract] [Full Text]

The effects of payment by results
Gerard Anderson
BMJ 2009 339: b3081. [Extract] [Full Text]

"HRG drift" and payment by results
Raquel Rogers, Susan Williams, Brian Jarman, and Paul Aylin
BMJ 2005 330: 563. [Full Text] [PDF]

Payment by results—new financial flows in the NHS
Jennifer Dixon
BMJ 2004 328: 969-970. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Watson, J. P (2009). Has payment by results affected how care is recorded?. BMJ 339: b3858-b3858 [Full text]  
  • Pittrof, R. (2009). Market failure. BMJ 339: b3859-b3859 [Full text]  
  • Anderson, G. (2009). The effects of payment by results. BMJ 339: b3081-b3081 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Are you getting what they’ve paid for?
Erin S Cottrill
bmj.com, 6 Sep 2009 [Full text]
Payment by results discourages sustainable healthcare.
Andrew Connor, et al.
bmj.com, 9 Sep 2009 [Full text]
PbR and Market Failure
Rudiger Pittrof
bmj.com, 11 Sep 2009 [Full text]
Has Payment by Results affected how hospitals provide care - or simply how they record it?
John P Watson
bmj.com, 16 Sep 2009 [Full text]
PbR - Questions still remain.
Peter J Robertson
bmj.com, 2 Oct 2009 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ