Published 13 August 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b3094
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;339:b3094

Research

Alarm symptoms and identification of non-cancer diagnoses in primary care: cohort study

Roger Jones, Wolfson professor of general practice1, Judith Charlton, research assistant2, Radoslav Latinovic, database manager2, Martin C Gulliford, professor of public health2

1 Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London School of Medicine at Guy’s, King’s College and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London SE11 6SP , 2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Health and Social Care Research, King’s College London School of Medicine at Guy’s, King’s College and St Thomas’ Hospitals, London SE1 3QD

Correspondence to: R Jones roger.jones{at}kcl.ac.uk

Objective To evaluate the predictive value of alarm symptoms for specified non-cancer diagnoses and cancer diagnoses in primary care.

Design Cohort study using the general practice research database.

Setting 128 general practices in the UK contributing data, 1994-2000.

Participants 762 325 patients aged 15 or older.

Main outcome measures Up to 15 pre-specified, non-cancer diagnoses associated with four alarm symptoms (haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, rectal bleeding) at 90 days and three years after the first recorded alarm symptom. For each outcome analyses were implemented separately in a time to event framework. Data were censored if patients died, left the practice, or reached the end of the study period.

Results We analysed data on first episodes of haematuria (11 108), haemoptysis (4812), dysphagia (5999), or rectal bleeding (15 289). Non-cancer diagnoses were common in patients who presented with alarm symptoms. The proportion diagnosed with either cancer or non-cancer diagnoses generally increased with age. In patients presenting with haematuria, the proportions diagnosed with either cancer or non-cancer diagnoses within 90 days were 17.5% (95% confidence interval 16.4% to 18.6%) in women and 18.3% (17.4% to 19.3%) in men. For the other symptoms the proportions were 25.7% (23.8% to 27.8%) and 24% (22.5% to 25.6%) for haemoptysis, 17.2% (16% to 18.5%) and 22.6% (21% to 24.3%) for dysphagia, and 14.5% (13.7% to 15.3%) and 16.7% (15.8% to 17.5%) for rectal bleeding.

Conclusion Clinically relevant diagnoses are made in a high proportion of patients presenting with alarm symptoms. For every four to seven patients evaluated for haematuria, haemoptysis, dysphagia, or rectal bleeding, relevant diagnoses will be identified in one patient within 90 days.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Helicobacter pylori test and treat versus proton pump inhibitor in initial management of dyspepsia in primary care: multicentre randomised controlled trial (MRC-CUBE trial)
Brendan C Delaney, Michelle Qume, Paul Moayyedi, Richard F A Logan, Alexander C Ford, Cathy Elliott, Cliodna McNulty, Sue Wilson, and F D Richard Hobbs
BMJ 2008 336: 651-654. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Diagnostic scope of and exposure to primary care physicians in Australia, New Zealand, and the United States: cross sectional analysis of results from three national surveys
Andrew B Bindman, Christopher B Forrest, Helena Britt, Peter Crampton, and Azeem Majeed
BMJ 2007 334: 1261. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database
Roger Jones, Radoslav Latinovic, Judith Charlton, and Martin C Gulliford
BMJ 2007 334: 1040. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?
Roger Jones, Greg Rubin, and Pali Hungin
BMJ 2001 322: 1555-1556. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom.
H Jick, S S Jick, and L E Derby
BMJ 1991 302: 766-768. [Abstract] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Measuring symptoms
M Justin S Zaman
bmj.com, 3 Sep 2009 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ