Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 24 March 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b613
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b613
K M Venables, reader in occupational medicine1, C Brooks, data manager 1, L Linsell, medical statistician1, T J Keegan, research fellow1, T Langdon, assistant data manager1, T Fletcher, senior lecturer in environmental epidemiology2, M J Nieuwenhuijsen, research professor in environmental epidemiology, visiting professor3,4, N E S Maconochie, senior lecturer in epidemiology and medical statistics5, P Doyle, professor of epidemiology5, V Beral, professor and director 6, L M Carpenter, reader in statistical epidemiology1
1 Department of Public Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, 2 Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, 3 Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology, IMIM and CIBERESP, 08003 Barcelona, Spain, 4 Division of Epidemiology, Public Health and Primary Care, Imperial College, London, 5 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, 6 Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford
Correspondence to: K M Venables kate.venables{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk; L M Carpenter lucy.carpenter{at}dphpc.ox.ac.uk
Design Historical cohort study.
Data sources Archive of UK government research facility at Porton Down, UK military personnel records, and national death and cancer records.
Participants 18 276 male members of the UK armed forces who had spent one or more short periods (median 4 days between first and last test) at Porton Down and a comparison group of 17 600 non-Porton Down veterans followed to 31 December 2004.
Main outcome measures Mortality rate ratio of Porton Down compared with non-Porton Down veterans and standardised mortality ratio of each veteran group compared with the general population. Both ratios adjusted for age group and calendar period.
Results Porton Down veterans were similar to non-Porton Down veterans in year of enlistment (median 1951) but had longer military service (median 6.2 v 5.0 years). After a median follow-up of 43 years, 40% (7306) of Porton Down and 39% (6900) of non-Porton Down veterans had died. All cause mortality was slightly greater in Porton Down veterans (rate ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.10, P<0.001), more so for deaths outside the UK (1.26, 1.09 to 1.46). Of 12 cause specific groups examined, rate ratios in Porton Down veterans were increased for deaths attributed to infectious and parasitic (1.57, 1.07 to 2.29), genitourinary (1.46, 1.04 to 2.04), circulatory (1.07, 1.01 to 1.12), and external (non-medical) (1.17, 1.00 to 1.37) causes and decreased for deaths attributed to in situ, benign, and unspecified neoplasms (0.60, 0.37 to 0.99). There was no clear relation between type of chemical exposure and cause specific mortality. The mortality in both groups of veterans was lower than that in the general population (standardised mortality ratio 0.88, 0.85 to 0.90; 0.82, 0.80 to 0.84).
Conclusions Mortality was slightly higher in Porton Down than non-Porton Down veterans. With lack of information on other important factors, such as smoking or service overseas, it is not possible to attribute the small excess mortality to chemical exposures at Porton Down.
© Venables et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses