Published 30 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2376
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2376
Research
The benefits of statins in people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
J J Brugts, doctor1,
T Yetgin, doctor1,
S E Hoeks, epidemiologist1,
A M Gotto, professor, doctor2,
J Shepherd, professor, doctor3,
R G J Westendorp, professor, doctor4,
A J M de Craen, epidemiologist4,
R H Knopp, professor, doctor5,
H Nakamura, professor, doctor6,
P Ridker, professor, doctor7,
R van Domburg, epidemiologist1,
J W Deckers, doctor1
1 Department of Cardiology, Erasmus MC Thoraxcenter, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, Netherlands,
2 Weill Medical College of Cornell University, NY, USA,
3 University of Glasgow, Scotland,
4 Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands,
5 Department of Medicine and Northwest Lipid Research Clinic, WA, USA,
6 Mitsukoshi Health and Welfare Foundation, Tokyo, Japan,
7 Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Correspondence to: J J Brugts j.brugts{at}erasmusmc.nl
Objectives To investigate whether statins reduce all cause mortality
and major coronary and cerebrovascular events in people without
established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk
factors, and whether these effects are similar in men and women,
in young and older (>65 years) people, and in people with
diabetes mellitus.
Design Meta-analysis of randomised trials.
Data sources Cochrane controlled trials register, Embase, and Medline.
Data abstraction Two independent investigators identified studies on the clinical effects of statins compared with a placebo or control group and with follow-up of at least one year, at least 80% or more participants without established cardiovascular disease, and outcome data on mortality and major cardiovascular disease events. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Q and I2 statistics. Publication bias was assessed by visual examination of funnel plots and the Egger regression test.
Results 10 trials enrolled a total of 70 388 people, of whom 23 681 (34%) were women and 16 078 (23%) had diabetes mellitus. Mean follow-up was 4.1 years. Treatment with statins significantly reduced the risk of all cause mortality (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.81 to 0.96), major coronary events (0.70, 0.61 to0.81), and major cerebrovascular events (0.81, 0.71 to 0.93). No evidence of an increased risk of cancer was observed. There was no significant heterogeneity of the treatment effect in clinical subgroups.
Conclusion In patients without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors, statin use was associated with significantly improved survival and large reductions in the risk of major cardiovascular events.
© Brugts et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Relevant Articles
-
Lets start with reporting
- Martin Sprenger
BMJ 2009 339: b3035.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
-
Effects of statins in patients with chronic kidney disease: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomised controlled trials
- Giovanni F M Strippoli, Sankar D Navaneethan, David W Johnson, Vlado Perkovic, Fabio Pellegrini, Antonio Nicolucci, and Jonathan C Craig
BMJ 2008 336: 645-651.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Statin use in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease in primary care: cohort study and comparison of inclusion and outcome with patients in randomised trials
- Li Wei, Shah Ebrahim, Christopher Bartlett, Peter D Davey, Frank M Sullivan, and Thomas M MacDonald
BMJ 2005 330: 821.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
- Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson, Jonathan J Deeks, and Douglas G Altman
BMJ 2003 327: 557-560.
[Extract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis
- M R Law, N J Wald, and A R Rudnicka
BMJ 2003 326: 1423.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
-
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
- Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider, and Christoph Minder
BMJ 1997 315: 629-634.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
(2009). Statins for Primary Prevention: Homing in on Effectiveness. Journal Watch Cardiology
2009: 1-1
[Full text]
-
Sprenger, M.
(2009). Let's start with reporting. BMJ
339: b3035-b3035
[Full text]
-
(2009). Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. JWatch General
2009: 1-1
[Full text]
Rapid Responses:
Read all Rapid Responses
- Did statins have an adverse effect upon outcome in those suffering acute illnesses or trauma?
- Richard G Fiddian-Green
bmj.com, 1 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- Statin therapy: a need to balance efficacy, safety and healthcare expenditure?
- Giuseppe Lippi, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- The benefits are not for all
- Enzo Manzato
bmj.com, 1 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- What about clinical epidemiology?
- Martin Sprenger
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- Statins not the only defence
- Rosemary A Stanton
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- Will this Meta analysis Change Practice?
- Muhammad A. Hadi
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- Statins, meta-analyses, and clinical practice
- Luca Mascitelli, et al.
bmj.com, 2 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- Re: Will this Meta analysis Change Practice?
- Raymond G Holder
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- The pooled estimate of treatment effect could be of different magnitude depending on the level pf risk
- oscar mota
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- What about the definition of the people without established cardiovascular disease but with cardiovascular risk factors?
- Zhili li
bmj.com, 3 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- The risks of statins are underestimated
- Uffe Ravnskov
bmj.com, 4 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- Statins: Sooner is Better?
- Carlos Escobar, et al.
bmj.com, 5 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- It’s big! Absolutely?
- Arnaud Chiolero
bmj.com, 12 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- Statins, hypercholesterolemia and blood viscosity.
- Les O. Simpson
bmj.com, 14 Jul 2009
[Full text]
- Re: It’s big! Absolutely?
- L Sam Lewis
bmj.com, 3 Aug 2009
[Full text]
- Primary cardiovascular prevention: what role for statins (and for public policy)?
- Roberto Buzzetti, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Aug 2009
[Full text]
- Re: Primary cardiovascular prevention: what role for statins (and for public policy)?
- Les O. Simpson
bmj.com, 10 Aug 2009
[Full text]