Published 16 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b2025
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b2025

Research

Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data

¹ Cancer Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, ² NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, Fulwood House, Sheffield S10 3TH

Objective To investigate the relation between women’s reported use of breast and cervical screening and sociodemographic characteristics.

Design Cross sectional multipurpose survey.

Setting Private households, Great Britain.

Population 3185 women aged 40-74 interviewed in the National Statistics Omnibus Survey 2005-7.

Main outcome measures Ever had a mammogram, ever had a cervical smear, and, for each, timing of most recent screen.

Results 91% (95% confidence interval 90% to 92%) of women aged 40-74 years reported ever having had a cervical smear, and 93% (92% to 94%) of those aged 53-74 years reported ever having had a mammogram; 3% (2% to 4%) of women aged 53-74 years had never had either breast or cervical screening. Women were significantly more likely to have had a mammogram if they lived in households with cars (compared with no car: one car, odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.62; two or more cars, odds ratio 2.65, 1.34 to 5.26), and in owner occupied housing (compared with rented housing: own with mortgage, odds ratio 2.12, 1.12 to 4.00; own outright, odds ratio 2.19, 1.39 to 3.43), but no significant differences by ethnicity, education, occupation, or region were found. For cervical screening, ethnicity was the most important predictor; white British women were significantly more likely to have had a cervical smear than were women of other ethnicity (odds ratio 2.20, 1.41 to 3.42). Uptake of cervical screening was greater among more educated women but was not significantly associated with cars, housing tenure, or region.

Conclusions Most (84%) eligible women report having had both breast and cervical screening, but 3% report never having had either. Some inequalities exist in the reported use of screening, which differ by screening type; indicators of wealth were important for breast screening and ethnicity for cervical screening. The routine collection within general practice of additional sociodemographic information would aid monitoring of inequalities in screening coverage and inform policies to correct them.

© Moser et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics

Mike Quinn, Penny Babb, Jennifer Jones, and Elizabeth Allen
BMJ 1999 318: 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Falling sperm quality

D S Irvine
BMJ 1994 309: 476. [Extract] [Full Text]

Inequalities in women's health: looking at mortality differentials using an alternative approach

Kath A Moser, Helena S Pugh, and Peter O Goldblatt
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 296: 1221-1224. [Abstract] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Full information gives a clearer picture

Mitzi AJ Blennerhassett
bmj.com, 18 Jun 2009 [Full text]

Surnames and Breast Screening Uptake in a Cohort in Wales

Diane L Brook
bmj.com, 19 Jun 2009 [Full text]

Means of breast and cervical cancer screening are not sufficient

Souhail Alouini
bmj.com, 21 Jun 2009 [Full text]

Breast cancer and cervical screening in South Africa

Elsabe Bornman
bmj.com, 24 Jun 2009 [Full text]

Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening: raising the question of health inequities

Tremblay Dominique
bmj.com, 25 Jun 2009 [Full text]

Evidence of "the arrogance of preventive medicine"

Hazel Thornton
bmj.com, 25 Jun 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>