Published 3 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1865
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1865

Research

A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis

Durrane Thaver, research medical officer1, Anita K M Zaidi, professor1, Julia Critchley, senior lecturer in epidemiology2, Asma Azmatullah, research medical officer1, Syed Ali Madni, research medical officer1, Zulfiqar A Bhutta, professor and chair1

1 Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, The Aga Khan University, PO Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan, 2 Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle NE2 4HH

Correspondence to: A K M Zaidi anita.zaidi{at}aku.edu

Objectives To review evidence supporting use of fluoroquinolones as first line agents over other antibiotics for treating typhoid and paratyphoid fever (enteric fever).

Design Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Data sources Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group specialised register, CENTRAL (issue 4, 2007), Medline (1966-2007), Embase (1974-2007), LILACS (1982-2007), selected conferences, reference lists, and ongoing trial register (November 2007).

Review methods Trials comparing fluoroquinolones with chloramphenicol, cephalosporins, or azithromycin in culture-proven enteric fever were included. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Trials recruiting over 60% children were analysed separately from trials on adults. Primary outcomes studied were clinical failure, microbiological failure, and relapse.

Results Twenty trials were included. Trials were small and often of limited methodological quality. Only 10 trials concealed allocation and only three were blinded. In trials on adults, fluoroquinolones were not significantly different from chloramphenicol for clinical failure (594 participants) or microbiological failure (n=378), but reduced clinical relapse (odds ratio 0.14 (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.50), n=467, 6 trials). Azithromycin and fluoroquinolones were comparable (n=152, 2 trials). Compared with ceftriaxone, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.08 (0.01 to 0.45), n=120, 3 trials) but not microbiological failure or relapse. Compared with cefixime, fluoroquinolones reduced clinical failure (0.05 (0.01 to 0.24), n=238, 2 trials) and relapse (0.18 (0.03 to 0.91), n=218, 2 trials). In trials on children infected with nalidixic acid resistant strains, older fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin) produced more clinical failures than azithromycin (2.67 (1.16 to 6.11), n=125, 1 trial), but there were no differences with newer fluoroquinolones (gatifloxacin, n=285, 1 trial). Fluoroquinolones and cefixime were not significantly different (n=82, 1 trial).

Conclusions In adults, fluoroquinolones may be better than chloramphenicol for preventing clinical relapse. Data were limited for other comparisons, particularly for children.

© Thaver et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Treatment of enteric fever
Christopher M Parry and Nick J Beeching
BMJ 2009 338: b1159. [Extract] [Full Text]

What works in schizophrenia: Depot preparations may improve outcomes
Peter M Haddad and Omair Niaz
BMJ 2006 333: 353. [Extract] [Full Text]

Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of typhoid fever
Zulfiqar A Bhutta
BMJ 2006 333: 78-82. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
Peter Jüni, Douglas G Altman, and Matthias Egger
BMJ 2001 323: 42-46. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects
Jerome M Stern and R John Simes
BMJ 1997 315: 640-645. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bhutta, Z. A., Threlfall, J. (2009). Addressing the Global Disease Burden of Typhoid Fever. JAMA 302: 898-899 [Full text]  
  • Parry, C. M, Beeching, N. J (2009). Treatment of enteric fever. BMJ 338: b1159-b1159 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Side effect profile of Fluoroquinolones
Matiram Pun
bmj.com, 7 Jun 2009 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ