Published 3 June 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1735
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1735

Research

Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: postal questionnaire surveys

¹ UK Medical Careers Research Group, Unit of Health-Care Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Oxford University, Oxford, OX3 7LF

Objective To study the career progression of NHS doctors, comparing men and women.

Design Postal questionnaire surveys.

Participants and setting Graduates of 1977, 1988, and 1993 from all UK medical schools.

Results The response rate was 68% (7012/10 344). Within general practice, 97% (1208/1243) of men, 99% (264/267) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career, and 87% (1083/1248) of all women were principals. Median times from qualification to principal status were 5.8 (95% confidence interval 5.6 to 6.0) years for men, 5.6 (5.4 to 5.8) years for women who had worked full time during training, and 6.8 (6.5 to 7.0) years for all women. Of the 1977 and 1988 graduates in hospital practice, 96% (1293/1347) of men were consultants, compared with 92% (276/299) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career and 67% (277/416) of women who had not. Median time to first consultant post was 11.7 (11.5 to 11.9) years for men, 11.3 (11.0 to 11.6) years for women who worked full time during training, and 12.3 (12.0 to 12.6) years for all women. Women who had not always worked full time throughout their career were over-represented in general practice and under-represented in most hospital specialties, substantially so in the surgical specialties and anaesthetics. Women who had always worked full time were under-represented not only in the surgical specialties but also in general practice.

Conclusions Women not progressing as far and as fast as men was, generally, a reflection of not having always worked full time rather than their sex. The findings suggest that women do not generally encounter direct discrimination; however, the possibility that indirect discrimination, such as lack of opportunities for part time work, has influenced choice of specialty cannot be ruled out.

© Taylor et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Career trajectories and black holes

Tony Delamothe
BMJ 2009 338: b2374. [Extract] [Full Text]

The future of female doctors

Graham Winyard
BMJ 2009 338: b2223. [Extract] [Full Text]

Report says workforce planning must accommodate part time working for female doctors

Susan Mayor
BMJ 2009 338: b2252. [Extract] [Full Text]

Are there too many female medical graduates? No

Jane Dacre
BMJ 2008 336: 749. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Promotion to hospital consultant: regression analysis using NHS administrative data

Kostas Mavromaras and Anthony Scott
BMJ 2006 332: 148-151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Women doctors and their careers: what now?

Isobel Allen
BMJ 2005 331: 569-572. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Statistics Notes: Time to event (survival) data

Douglas G Altman and J Martin Bland
BMJ 1998 317: 468-469. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Career preferences of doctors who qualified in the United Kingdom in 1993 compared with those of doctors qualifying in 1974, 1977, 1980, and 1983

Trevor W Lambert, Michael J Goldacre, Carol Edwards, and James Parkhouse
BMJ 1996 313: 19-24. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Role models and patronage.

C Currie
BMJ 1993 306: 735-736. [PDF]

Effects of discrimination by sex and race on the early careers of British medical graduates during 1981-7.

P M McKeigue, J D Richards, and P Richards
BMJ 1990 301: 961-964. [Abstract] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Winyard, G. (2009). The future of female doctors. BMJ 338: b2223-b2223 [Full text]  

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>