Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 19 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.a3152
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a3152
Frank Davidoff, executive editor1, Paul Batalden, director2, David Stevens, director of the quality literature programme 2, Greg Ogrinc, associate director of the quality literature programme3,2, Susan E Mooney, medical director for quality improvement 4,2, for the SQUIRE development group
1 Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 143 Garden Street, Wethersfield, CT 06109, USA, 2 Center for Leadership and Improvement, Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice Lebanon, NH 03766, USA, 3 White River Junction VA Hospital, White River Junction, VT 05009-0001, USA, 4 Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital, Lebanon, NH 03766, USA
Correspondence to: F Davidoff fdavidoff{at}cox.net
In 2005 we published draft guidelines for reporting studies of quality improvement, as the initial step in a consensus process for development of a more definitive version. The current article contains the revised version, which we refer to as standards for quality improvement reporting excellence (SQUIRE). This narrative progress report summarises the special features of improvement that are reflected in SQUIRE, and describes major differences between SQUIRE and the initial draft guidelines. It also briefly describes the guideline development process; considers the limitations of and unresolved questions about SQUIRE; describes ancillary supporting documents and alternative versions under development; and discusses plans for dissemination, testing, and further development of SQUIRE.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?