Published 14 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.a3147
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a3147

Research

Comparing hospital and telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: randomised equivalence trial

¹ School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, ² Blackpool, Fylde and Wyre Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackpool, Lancashire, ³ Rosemere Cancer Centre, Royal Preston Hospital, Preston, Lancashire, ⁴ Health Methodology Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester

Objective To compare traditional hospital follow-up with telephone follow-up by specialist nurses after treatment for breast cancer.

Design A two centre randomised equivalence trial in which women remained in the study for a mean of 24 months.

Setting Outpatient clinics in two NHS hospital trusts in the north west of England

Participants 374 women treated for breast cancer who were at low to moderate risk of recurrence.

Interventions Participants were randomised to traditional hospital follow-up (consultation, clinical examination, and mammography as per hospital policy) or telephone follow-up by specialist nurses (consultation with structured intervention and mammography according to hospital policy).

Main outcome measures Psychological morbidity (state-trait anxiety inventory, general health questionnaire (GHQ-12)), participants’ needs for information, participants’ satisfaction, clinical investigations ordered, and time to detection of recurrent disease.

Results The 95% confidence interval for difference in mean state-trait scores adjusted for treatment received (–3.33 to 2.07) was within the predefined equivalence region (–3.5 to 3.5). The women in the telephone group were no more anxious as a result of foregoing clinic examinations and face-to-face consultations and reported higher levels of satisfaction than those attending hospital clinics (intention to treat P<0.001). The numbers of clinical investigations ordered did not differ between groups. Recurrences were few (4.5%), with no differences between groups for time to detection (median 60.5 (range 37-131) days in hospital group v 39.0 (10-152) days in telephone group; P=0.228).

Conclusions Telephone follow-up was well received by participants, with no physical or psychological disadvantage. It is suitable for women at low to moderate risk of recurrence and those with long travelling distances or mobility problems and decreases the burden on busy hospital clinics.

Trial registration National Cancer Research Institute 1477.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Follow-up by telephone after treatment for breast cancer

David A Montgomery
BMJ 2009 338: a2753. [Extract] [Full Text]

Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial

Eva Grunfeld, David Mant, Patricia Yudkin, Ruth Adewuyi-Dalton, David Cole, Jill Stewart, Ray Fitzpatrick, and Martin Vessey
BMJ 1996 313: 665-669. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Trials to assess equivalence: the importance of rigorous methods

B Jones, P Jarvis, J A Lewis, and A F Ebbutt
BMJ 1996 313: 36-39. [Extract] [Full Text]

Psychological support for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: a randomised study

June M C McArdle, W David George, Colin S McArdle, David C Smith, Alastair R Moodie, A V Mark Hughson, and Gordon D Murray
BMJ 1996 312: 813-816. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Value of routine follow up of women treated for early carcinoma of the breast.

J A Dewar and G R Kerr
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 291: 1464-1467. [Abstract] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2009). Phone Follow-Up for Breast Cancer Survivors. JWatch Women's Health 2009: 4-4 [Full text]  
• (2009). Routine Clinical vs. Telephone Follow-Up After Treatment for Breast Cancer. JWatch General 2009: 2-2 [Full text]  

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>