Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 8 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.a3083
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a3083
Wouter de Ruijter, general practitioner and clinical researcher1, Rudi G J Westendorp, professor2, Willem J J Assendelft, professor1, Wendy P J den Elzen, clinical researcher1, Anton J M de Craen, senior epidemiologist2, Saskia le Cessie, statistician3, Jacobijn Gussekloo, professor1
1 Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Public Health and Primary Care (V0-P), PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands, 2 Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Gerontology and Geriatrics (C2-R), PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands, 3 Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Statistics (S5-P), PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
Correspondence to: W de Ruijter w.de_ruijter{at}lumc.nl
Design The Leiden 85-plus Study (1997-2004) is an observational prospective cohort study with 5 years of follow-up.
Setting General population of the city of Leiden, the Netherlands.
Participants Population based sample of participants aged 85 years (215 women and 87 men) with no history of cardiovascular disease; no other exclusion criteria.
Main measurements Cause specific mortality was registered during follow-up. All classic risk factors included in the Framingham risk score (sex, systolic blood pressure, total and high density lipoprotein cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, smoking and electrocardiogram based left ventricular hypertrophy), as well as plasma concentrations of the new biomarkers homocysteine, folic acid, C reactive protein, and interleukin 6, were assessed at baseline.
Results During follow-up, 108 of the 302 participants died; 32% (35/108) of deaths were from cardiovascular causes. Classic risk factors did not predict cardiovascular mortality when used in the Framingham risk score (area under receiver operating characteristic curve 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.63) or in a newly calibrated model (0.53, 0.43 to 0.64). Of the new biomarkers studied, homocysteine had most predictive power (0.65, 0.55 to 0.75). Entering any additional risk factor or combination of factors into the homocysteine prediction model did not increase its discriminative power.
Conclusions In very old people from the general population with no history of cardiovascular disease, concentrations of homocysteine alone can accurately identify those at high risk of cardiovascular mortality, whereas classic risk factors included in the Framingham risk score do not. These preliminary findings warrant validation in a separate cohort.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses