Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 8 January 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2981
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:a2981
Ian Colman, assistant professor1, Joseph Murray, postdoctoral fellow2, Rosemary A Abbott, research associate3, Barbara Maughan, professor4, Diana Kuh, professor, director5, Tim J Croudace, senior lecturer3, Peter B Jones, psychiatrist, professor, head3
1 School of Public Health, University of Alberta, 13-130D Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2G3, 2 Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, 3 Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge , 4 MRC Social, Genetic and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Kings College London Institute of Psychiatry, London, 5 Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, London
Correspondence to: I Colman ian.colman{at}ualberta.ca
Design Longitudinal study from age 13-53.
Setting The Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development (the British 1946 birth cohort).
Participants 3652 survey members assessed by their teachers for symptoms of externalising behaviour at age 13 and 15.
Main outcome measures Mental disorder, alcohol abuse, relationship difficulties, highest level of education, social class, unemployment, and financial difficulties at ages 36-53.
Results 348 adolescents were identified with severe externalising behaviour, 1051 with mild externalising behaviour, and 2253 with no externalising behaviour. All negative outcomes measured in adulthood were more common in those with severe or mild externalising behaviour in adolescence, as rated by teachers, compared with those with no externalising behaviour. Adolescents with severe externalising behaviour were more likely to leave school without any qualifications (65.2%; adjusted odds ratio 4.0, 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 5.5), as were those with mild externalising behaviour (52.2%; 2.3, 1.9 to 2.8), compared with those with no externalising behaviour (30.8%). On a composite measure of global adversity throughout adulthood that included mental health, family life and relationships, and educational and economic problems, those with severe externalising behaviour scored significantly higher (40.1% in top quarter), as did those with mild externalising behaviour (28.3%), compared with those with no externalising behaviour (17.0%).
Conclusions Adolescents who exhibit externalising behaviour experience multiple social and health impairments that adversely affect them, their families, and society throughout adult life.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses