Published 17 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b480
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b480

Research

Effect of tobacco smoking on survival of men and women by social position: a 28 year cohort study

¹ NHS Health Scotland, Elphinstone House, Glasgow G2 2AF, ² Public Health and Health Policy, Division of Community-based Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RZ, ³ General Practice and Primary Care, Division of Community-based Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 9LX

Objective To assess the impact of tobacco smoking on the survival of men and women in different social positions.

Design A cohort observational study.

Setting Renfrew and Paisley, two towns in west central Scotland.

Participants 8353 women and 7049 men aged 45-64 years recruited in 1972-6 (almost 80% of the population in this age group). The cohort was divided into 24 groups by sex (male, female), smoking status (current, former, or never smokers), and social class (classes I + II, III non-manual, III manual, and IV + V) or deprivation category of place of residence.

Main outcome measure Relative mortality (adjusted for age and other risk factors) in the different groups; Kaplan-Meier survival curves and survival rates at 28 years.

Results Of those with complete data, 4387/7988 women and 4891/6967 men died over the 28 years. Compared with women in social classes I + II who had never smoked (the group with lowest mortality), the adjusted relative mortality of smoking groups ranged from 1.7 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.3) to 4.2 (3.3 to 5.5). Former smokers’ mortalities were closer to those of never smokers than those of smokers. By social class (highest first), age adjusted survival rates after 28 years were 65%, 57%, 53%, and 56% for female never smokers; 41%, 42%, 33%, and 35% for female current smokers; 53%, 47%, 38%, and 36% for male never smokers; and 24%, 24%, 19%, and 18% for male current smokers. Analysis by deprivation category gave similar results.

Conclusions Among both women and men, never smokers had much better survival rates than smokers in all social positions. Smoking itself was a greater source of health inequality than social position and nullified women’s survival advantage over men. This suggests the scope for reducing health inequalities related to social position in this and similar populations is limited unless many smokers in lower social positions stop smoking.

© Gruer et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Interactive case reports

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2009 338: b1012. [Extract] [Full Text]

Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors

Richard Doll, Richard Peto, Jillian Boreham, and Isabelle Sutherland
BMJ 2004 328: 1519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Smoking, smoking cessation, and lung cancer in the UK since 1950: combination of national statistics with two case-control studies

Richard Peto, Sarah Darby, Harz Deo, Paul Silcocks, Elise Whitley, and Richard Doll
BMJ 2000 321: 323-329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study

D J Hole, G C M Watt, G Davey-Smith, C L Hart, C R Gillis, and V M Hawthorne
BMJ 1996 313: 711-715. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

What the Renfrew / Paisley data really tell us about tackling health inequalities: the need to refocus upstream

Alex Scott-Samuel
bmj.com, 28 Feb 2009 [Full text]

Interpeting the Renfrew/Paisley data: a mixed picture of health inequalities emerges

Ken Judge
bmj.com, 2 Mar 2009 [Full text]

Smoking, altered blood rheology and survival.

Les O. Simpson
bmj.com, 6 Mar 2009 [Full text]

Neither more reports, nor papers. It’s time to declare full war against tobacco.

Alain Braillon
bmj.com, 17 Mar 2009 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more>>