Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 16 February 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b92
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b92
Matthias Briel, senior researcher 1,2, Ignacio Ferreira-Gonzalez, senior researcher3, John J You, assistant professor1,4, Paul J Karanicolas, senior researcher5, Elie A Akl, assistant professor6, Ping Wu, research associate7, Boris Blechacz, instructor in medicine8, Dirk Bassler, senior researcher9, Xinge Wei, physician1, Asheer Sharman, physician4, Irene Whitt, physician8, Suzana Alves da Silva, senior researcher10, Zahira Khalid, physician4, Alain J Nordmann, senior researcher2, Qi Zhou, statistician1, Stephen D Walter, professor1, Noah Vale, junior researcher1, Neera Bhatnagar, librarian1, Christopher ORegan, research associate11, Edward J Mills, assistant professor12, Heiner C Bucher, professor2, Victor M Montori, associate professor13, Gordon H Guyatt, professor1,4
1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 2 Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 3 Department of Cardiology, Vall dHebron Hospital, Barcelona, and CIBER de Epidemiologia y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Spain, 4 Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 5 Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, 6 Department of Medicine, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA, 7 Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine, Toronto, ON, 8 Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, 9 Department of Neonatology, University Childrens Hospital, Tuebingen, Germany, 10 Department of Research, Teaching and Research Center of Pro-Cardiaco/PROCEP, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 11 Pfizer Ltd, Walton on the Hill, Surrey, 12 British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, St Pauls Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 13 Division of Endocrinology and Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit, Mayo Clinic
Correspondence to: M Briel brielm{at}uhbs.ch
Design Systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Data sources Medline, Embase, Central, CINAHL, and AMED to October 2006 supplemented by contact with experts in the field.
Study selection In teams of two, reviewers independently determined eligibility of randomised trials that tested lipid modifying interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk, reported high density lipoprotein cholesterol and mortality or myocardial infarctions separately for treatment groups, and treated and followed participants for at least six months.
Data extraction and synthesis Using standardised, pre-piloted forms, reviewers independently extracted relevant information from each article. The change in lipid concentrations for each trial and the weighted risk ratios for clinical outcomes were calculated.
Results The meta-regression analysis included 108 randomised trials involving 299 310 participants at risk of cardiovascular events. All analyses that adjusted for changes in low density lipoprotein cholesterol showed no association between treatment induced change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk ratios for coronary heart disease deaths, coronary heart disease events, or total deaths. With all trials included, change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol explained almost no variability (<1%) in any of the outcomes. The change in the quotient of low density lipoprotein cholesterol and high density lipoprotein cholesterol did not explain more of the variability in any of the outcomes than did the change in low density lipoprotein cholesterol alone. For a 10 mg/dl (0.26 mmol/l) reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol, the relative risk reduction was 7.2% (95% confidence interval 3.1% to 11%; P=0.001) for coronary heart disease deaths, 7.1% (4.5% to 9.8%; P<0.001) for coronary heart disease events, and 4.4% (1.6% to 7.2%; P=0.002) for total deaths, when adjusted for change in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and drug class.
Conclusions Available data suggest that simply increasing the amount of circulating high density lipoprotein cholesterol does not reduce the risk of coronary heart disease events, coronary heart disease deaths, or total deaths. The results support reduction in low density lipoprotein cholesterol as the primary goal for lipid modifying interventions.
© Briel et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses