Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 22 April 2009, doi:10.1136/bmj.b1326
Cite this as: BMJ 2009;338:b1326
Lucy Selman, research associate1, Irene J Higginson, professor1, Godfrey Agupio, research nurse2, Natalya Dinat, director3, Julia Downing, deputy executive director4, Liz Gwyther, senior lecturer5, Thandi Mashao, research nurse6, Keletso Mmoledi, palliative care service team leader3, Anthony P Moll, chief medical officer7, Lydia Mpanga Sebuyira, head of training department8, Barbara Panajatovic, chief executive9, Richard Harding, senior lecturer1
1 Kings College London, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, Kings College London, London SE5 9RJ, 2 Hospice Africa Uganda, PO Box 7757, Kampala, Uganda, 3 Witwatersrand Palliative Care, PO Box 212, Pimville, Soweto 1808, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa, 4 African Palliative Care Association, PO Box 72518, Kampala, 5 Hospice Palliative Care Association of South Africa, PO Box 38785, Pinelands 7430, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa, 6 Palliative Medicine Unit, University of Cape Town, Observatory 7925, Cape Town, 7 Church of Scotland Hospital, P/Bag X502, Tugela Ferry 3010, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa, 8 Infectious Diseases Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Makerere University, PO Box 22418, Kampala, 9 Msunduzi Hospice, PO Box 220223, Pietermaritzburg 3208, KwaZulu Natal
Corresponding author: L Selman lucy.selman{at}kcl.ac.uk
Design Semistructured qualitative interview study.
Setting Four palliative care services in South Africa and one in Uganda, covering rural, urban, and peri-urban locations.
Participants 90 patients and 38 family caregivers enrolled in palliative care services; 28 patients had cancer, 61 had HIV infection (including 6 dual HIV/cancer diagnoses), and 1 had motor neurone disease.
Results Five themes emerged from the data. (1) Information sources: a lack of information from general healthcare providers meant that patients and caregivers had to draw on alternative sources of information. (2) Information needs: patients and caregivers reported needing more information in the key areas of the causes and progression of the disease, its symptoms and treatment, and financial/social support. (3) Impact of unmet needs: poor provision of information had a detrimental effect on patients and caregivers ability to cope. (4) Communication: negative experiences of communication with general healthcare staff were reported (misinformation, secrecy, insensitivity). (5) Barriers to effective provision of information: barriers related to symptoms, culture, time constraints in hospital, and paternalism in general health care.
Conclusions Lack of information was a major theme for both patients and carers, who had important unanswered questions relating to living with a progressive incurable disease. Evidence based recommendations for clinicians are presented, including the proactive provision of information tailored to individual patients and families.
© Selman et al 2009
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses