Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 18 September 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1284
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1284
M Arbyn, head of unit of cancer epidemiology, leader, working package HPV screening1,2, M Kyrgiou, assistant3, C Simoens, assistant1, A O Raifu, assistant1, G Koliopoulos, senior lecturer4, P Martin-Hirsch, consultant gynaecological oncologist3, W Prendiville, associated professor5, E Paraskevaidis, head of department4
1 Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium, 2 European Cooperation on Development and Implementation of Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines, IARC, Lyon, France, 3 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Central Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, Lancashire, 4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece, 5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Coombe Womens Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
Correspondence to: M ArbynMarc.Arbyn{at}iph.fgov.be
Data sources Medline and Embase citation tracking from January 1960 to December 2007.
Selection criteria Eligible studies had data on severe pregnancy outcomes for women with and without previous treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Considered outcomes were perinatal mortality, severe preterm delivery (<32/34 weeks), extreme preterm delivery (<28/30 weeks), and low birth weight (<2000 g, <1500 g, and <1000 g). Excisional and ablative treatment procedures were distinguished.
Results One prospective cohort and 19 retrospective studies were retrieved. Cold knife conisation was associated with a significantly increased risk of perinatal mortality (relative risk 2.87, 95% confidence interval 1.42 to 5.81) and a significantly higher risk of severe preterm delivery (2.78, 1.72 to 4.51), extreme preterm delivery (5.33, 1.63 to 17.40), and low birth weight of <2000 g (2.86, 1.37 to 5.97). Laser conisation, described in only one study, was also followed by a significantly increased chance of low birth weight of <2000 g and <1500 g. Large loop excision of the transformation zone and ablative treatment with cryotherapy or laser were not associated with a significantly increased risk of serious adverse pregnancy outcomes. Ablation by radical diathermy was associated with a significantly higher frequency of perinatal mortality, severe and extreme preterm delivery, and low birth weight below 2000 g or 1500 g.
Conclusions In the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, cold knife conisation and probably both laser conisation and radical diathermy are associated with an increased risk of subsequent perinatal mortality and other serious pregnancy outcomes, unlike laser ablation and cryotherapy. Large loop excision of the transformation zone cannot be considered as completely free of adverse outcomes.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?