Published 28 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2030
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2030

Research

Effect of social deprivation on blood pressure monitoring and control in England: a survey of data from the quality and outcomes framework

¹ King’s College London, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, Division of Health and Social Care Research, London SE11 6SP, ² King’s College London, Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Health and Social Care Research, London SE1 3QD

Objective To determine levels of blood pressure monitoring and control in primary care and to determine the effect of social deprivation on these levels.

Design Retrospective longitudinal survey, 2005 to 2007.

Setting General practices in England.

Participants Data obtained from 8515 practices (99.3% of all practices) in year 1, 8264 (98.3%) in year 2, and 8192 (97.8%) in year 3.

Main outcome measures Blood pressure indicators and chronic disease prevalence estimates contained within the UK quality and outcomes framework; social deprivation scores for each practice, ethnicity data obtained from the 2001 national census; general practice characteristics.

Results In 2005, 82.3% of adults (n=52.8m) had an up to date blood pressure recording; by 2007, this proportion had risen to 88.3% (n=53.2m). Initially, there was a 1.7% gap between mean blood pressure recording levels in practices located in the least deprived fifth of communities compared with the most deprived fifth, but, three years later, this gap had narrowed to 0.2%. Achievement of target blood pressure levels in 2005 for practices located in the least deprived communities ranged from 71.0% (95% CI 70.4% to 71.6%) for diabetes to 85.1% (84.7% to 85.6%) for coronary heart disease; practices in the most deprived communities achieved 68.9% (68.4% to 69.5%) and 81.8 % (81.3% to 82.3%) respectively. Three years later, target achievement in the least deprived practices had risen to 78.6% (78.1% to 79.1%) and 89.4% (89.1% to 89.7%) respectively. Target achievement in the most deprived practices rose similarly, to 79.2% (78.8% to 79.6%) and 88.4% (88.2% to 88.7%) respectively. Similar changes were observed for the achievement of blood pressure targets in hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and chronic kidney disease.

Conclusions Since the reporting of performance indicators for primary care and the incorporation of pay for performance in 2004, blood pressure monitoring and control have improved substantially. Improvements in achievement have been accompanied by the near disappearance of the achievement gap between least and most deprived areas.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Sociodemographic variations in the contribution of secondary drug prevention to stroke survival at middle and older ages: cohort study

Rosalind Raine, Wun Wong, Gareth Ambler, Sarah Hardoon, Irene Petersen, Richard Morris, Mel Bartley, and David Blane
BMJ 2009 338: b1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

MPs criticise lack of evidence in government’s health inequality strategy

Jacqui Wise
BMJ 2009 338: b1117. [Extract] [Full Text]

Accurate deprivation scores are needed

Mark Strong
BMJ 2008 337: a2926. [Extract] [Full Text]

A good QOFfing whine

Tony Delamothe
BMJ 2008 337: a2632. [Extract] [Full Text]

The UK quality and outcomes framework

Helen Lester
BMJ 2008 337: a2095. [Extract] [Full Text]

Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study

Stephen M Campbell, Martin O Roland, Elizabeth Middleton, and David Reeves
BMJ 2005 331: 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Livesey, S. (2009). Socio-economic deprivation and outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. Heart 95: 785-786 [Full text]  
• Raine, R., Wong, W., Ambler, G., Hardoon, S., Petersen, I., Morris, R., Bartley, M., Blane, D. (2009). Sociodemographic variations in the contribution of secondary drug prevention to stroke survival at middle and older ages: cohort study. BMJ 338: b1279-b1279 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Vaghela, P., Ashworth, M., Schofield, P., Gulliford, M. C. (2009). Population Intermediate Outcomes of Diabetes Under Pay-for-Performance Incentives in England From 2004 to 2008. Diabetes Care 32: 427-429 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Falaschetti, E., Chaudhury, M., Mindell, J., Poulter, N. (2009). Continued Improvement in Hypertension Management in England: Results From the Health Survey for England 2006. Hypertension 53: 480-486 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Strong, M. (2008). Accurate deprivation scores are needed. BMJ 337: a2926-a2926 [Full text]  
• Lester, H. (2008). The UK quality and outcomes framework. BMJ 337: a2095-a2095 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

prevalence of prehypertension needs to be better characterised, and treatment goals better defined

oscar,m jolobe
bmj.com, 31 Oct 2008 [Full text]

trends

Nigel Konzon
bmj.com, 21 Nov 2008 [Full text]

Important inequalities still remain

Nick Payne
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2008 [Full text]

Calculation of deprivation scores

Gary McLean, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2008 [Full text]

Is primary care equitable? A need for an accurate measure of socio-economic deprivation.

Mark Strong
bmj.com, 28 Nov 2008 [Full text]

Interpreting patterns of changes in absolute differences between rates when common outcomes become even more common

James P. Scanlan
bmj.com, 7 Dec 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>