Published 17 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1702
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1702

Research

Patient safety indicators for England from hospital administrative data: case-control analysis and comparison with US data

¹ Healthcare Commission, London EC1Y 8TG, ² University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7WG, ³ National Patient Safety Agency, London W1T 5HD

Objective To assess the feasibility of deriving patient safety indicators for England from routine hospital data and whether they can indicate adverse outcomes for patients.

Design Nine patient safety indicators developed by the United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) were derived using hospital episode statistics for England for 2003-4, 2004-5, and 2005-6. A case-control analysis was undertaken to compare length of stay and mortality between cases (patients experiencing the particular safety event measured by an indicator) and controls matched for age, sex, health resource group (standard groupings of clinically similar treatments that use similar levels of healthcare resource), main specialty, and trust. Comparisons were undertaken with US data.

Setting All NHS trusts in England.

Participants Inpatients in NHS trusts.

Results There was fair consistency in national rates for the nine indicators across three years. For all but one indicator, hospital stays were longer in cases than in matched controls (range 0.2-17.1 days, P<0.001). Mortality in cases was also higher than in controls (5.7-27.1%, P<0.001), except for the obstetric trauma indicators. Excess length of stay and mortality in cases was greatest for postoperative hip fracture and sepsis. England’s rates were lower than US rates for these indicators. Increased length of stay in cases was generally greater in England than in the US. Excess mortality was also higher in England than in the US, except for the obstetric trauma indicators where there were few deaths in both countries. Differences between England and the US in excess length of stay and mortality were most marked for postoperative hip fracture.

Conclusions Hospital administrative data provide a potentially useful low burden, low cost source of information on safety events. Indicators can be derived with English data and show that cases have poorer outcomes than matched controls. These data therefore have potential for monitoring safety events. Further validation, for example, of individual cases, is needed and levels of event recording need to improve. Differences between England and the US might reflect differences in the depth of event coding and in health systems and patterns of healthcare provision.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review

Ali Baba-Akbari Sari, Trevor A Sheldon, Alison Cracknell, and Alastair Turnbull
BMJ 2007 334: 79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

How often are adverse events reported in English hospital statistics?

Paul Aylin, Shivani Tanna, Alex Bottle, and Brian Jarman
BMJ 2004 329: 369. [Full Text] [PDF]

Adverse events in British hospitals: preliminary retrospective record review

Charles Vincent, Graham Neale, and Maria Woloshynowych
BMJ 2001 322: 517-519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Drosler, S. E., Klazinga, N. S., Romano, P. S., Tancredi, D. J., Gogorcena Aoiz, M. A., Hewitt, M. C., Scobie, S., Soop, M., Wen, E., Quan, H., Ghali, W. A., Mattke, S., Kelley, E. (2009). Application of patient safety indicators internationally: a pilot study among seven countries. Int J Qual Health Care 21: 272-278 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Obstetric patient safety indicator may be invalid

Lucy C Chappell, et al.
bmj.com, 24 Oct 2008 [Full text]

Obstetric patient safety indicator may be invalid: author response

Veena S Raleigh, et al.
bmj.com, 25 Nov 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>