Published 2 October 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1518
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1518

Research

Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review

¹ Welsh Child Protection Systematic Review Group, Clinical Epidemiology Interdisciplinary Research Group, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales Heath Park, Cardiff CF 2XX, ² Radiology Department, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, ³ Support Unit for Research Evidence, Cardiff University, ⁴ Orthopaedic Department, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, School of Medicine, Cardiff University

Objectives To systematically review published studies to identify the characteristics that distinguish fractures in children resulting from abuse and those not resulting from abuse, and to calculate a probability of abuse for individual fracture types.

Design Systematic review.

Data sources All language literature search of Medline, Medline in Process, Embase, Assia, Caredata, Child Data, CINAHL, ISI Proceedings, Sciences Citation, Social Science Citation Index, SIGLE, Scopus, TRIP, and Social Care Online for original study articles, references, textbooks, and conference abstracts until May 2007.

Study selection Comparative studies of fracture at different bony sites, sustained in physical abuse and from other causes in children <18 years old were included. Review articles, expert opinion, postmortem studies, and studies in adults were excluded.

Data extraction and synthesis Each study had two independent reviews (three if disputed) by specialist reviewers including paediatricians, paediatric radiologists, orthopaedic surgeons, and named nurses in child protection. Each study was critically appraised by using data extraction sheets, critical appraisal forms, and evidence sheets based on NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance. Meta-analysis was done where possible. A random effects model was fitted to account for the heterogeneity between studies.

Results In total, 32 studies were included. Fractures resulting from abuse were recorded throughout the skeletal system, most commonly in infants (<1 year) and toddlers (between 1 and 3 years old). Multiple fractures were more common in cases of abuse. Once major trauma was excluded, rib fractures had the highest probability for abuse (0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.91). The probability of abuse given a humeral fracture lay between 0.48 (0.06 to 0.94) and 0.54 (0.20 to 0.88), depending on the definition of abuse used. Analysis of fracture type showed that supracondylar humeral fractures were less likely to be inflicted. For femoral fractures, the probability was between 0.28 (0.15 to 0.44) and 0.43 (0.32 to 0.54), depending on the definition of abuse used, and the developmental stage of the child was an important discriminator. The probability for skull fractures was 0.30 (0.19 to 0.46); the most common fractures in abuse and non-abuse were linear fractures. Insufficient comparative studies were available to allow calculation of a probability of abuse for other fracture types.

Conclusion When infants and toddlers present with a fracture in the absence of a confirmed cause, physical abuse should be considered as a potential cause. No fracture, on its own, can distinguish an abusive from a non-abusive cause. During the assessment of individual fractures, the site, fracture type, and developmental stage of the child can help to determine the likelihood of abuse. The number of high quality comparative research studies in this field is limited, and further prospective epidemiology is indicated.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Femur fracture in an infant

Jenny S Radesky and Naomi F Sugar
BMJ 2009 338: b1583. [Extract] [Full Text]

Diagnosing child abuse

Naomi F Sugar
BMJ 2008 337: a1398. [Extract] [Full Text]

Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting

Susan Mallett, Jonathan J Deeks, Steve Halligan, Sally Hopewell, Victoria Cornelius, and Douglas G Altman
BMJ 2006 333: 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Radesky, J. S, Sugar, N. F (2009). Femur fracture in an infant. BMJ 338: b1583-b1583 [Full text]  
• (2009). For questions on page. Emerg. Med. J. 26: 308-308 [Full text]  
• (2008). When to Suspect Abuse in Children with Fractures. JWatch Emergency Med. 2008: 3-3 [Full text]  
• Sugar, N. F (2008). Diagnosing child abuse. BMJ 337: a1398-a1398 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Mandatory Osteogenesis Imperfecta Screening in Suspected Non-accidental Injury?

Chika Uzoigwe, et al.
bmj.com, 12 Oct 2008 [Full text]

"Unexplained" fractures

James R Le Fanu, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Oct 2008 [Full text]

unexplained fractures

Alison M Kemp, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Nov 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>