Published 27 November 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2547
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2547

Research

Impact of a new national screening policy for Down’s syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study

¹ Department of Fetal Medicine, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark, ² Fetal Medicine Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Denmark, ³ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, ⁴ Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen

Objectives To evaluate the impact of a screening strategy in the first trimester, introduced in Denmark during 2004-6, on the number of infants born with Down’s syndrome and the number of chorionic villus samplings and amniocenteses, and to determine detection and false positive rates in the screened population in 2005 and 2006.

Design Population based cohort study.

Setting 19 Danish departments of gynaecology and obstetrics and a central cytogenetic registry 2000-7.

Participants 65 000 pregnancies per year.

Main outcome measures The primary outcomes measured were number of fetuses and newborn infants with Down’s syndrome diagnosed prenatally and postnatally and number of chorionic villus samplings and amniocenteses carried out. Secondary outcomes measured were number of women screened in 2005 and 2006, screen positive rate, and information on screening in 2005 and 2006 for infants with a postnatal diagnosis of Down’s syndrome.

Results The number of infants born with Down’s syndrome decreased from 55-65 per year during 2000-4 to 31 in 2005 and 32 in 2006. The total number of chorionic villus samplings and amniocenteses carried out decreased from 7524 in 2000 to 3510 in 2006. The detection rate in the screened population in 2005 was 86% (95% confidence interval 79% to 92%) and in 2006 was 93% (87% to 97%). The corresponding false positive rates were 3.9% (3.7% to 4.1%) and 3.3% (3.1% to 3.4%).

Conclusion The introduction of a combined risk assessment during the first trimester at a national level in Denmark halved the number of infants born with Down’s syndrome. The strategy also resulted in a sharp decline in the number of chorionic villus samplings and amniocenteses carried out, even before full implementation of the policy.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Trends in Down’s syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008: analysis of data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register

Joan K Morris and Eva Alberman
BMJ 2009 339: b3794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

People with disabilities are not equal from the start

Joyce M Carter
BMJ 2009 338: b1497. [Extract] [Full Text]

Tricky thing, choice

Jane Smith
BMJ 2009 338: b707. [Extract] [Full Text]

Prenatal screening for Down’s syndrome

Zarko Alfirevic
BMJ 2009 338: b140. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Skotko, B. G (2009). With new prenatal testing, will babies with Down syndrome slowly disappear?. Arch. Dis. Child. 94: 823-826 [Full text]  
• Morris, J. K, Alberman, E. (2009). Trends in Down's syndrome live births and antenatal diagnoses in England and Wales from 1989 to 2008: analysis of data from the National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register. BMJ 339: b3794-b3794 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Carter, J. M (2009). People with disabilities are not equal from the start. BMJ 338: b1497-b1497 [Full text]  
• (2008). Down Syndrome Birth Rate Lower After Screening. JWatch Women's Health 2008: 1-1 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Impact of different algorithms on the detection rate of different aneuploidies

Bernd Eiben, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Dec 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>