Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 13 November 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2240
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2240
Neha Sekhri, clinical research fellow1, Gene S Feder, professor of primary health care4, Cornelia Junghans, research fellow in epidemiology3, Sandra Eldridge, professor of medical statistics2, Athavan Umaipalan, medical student2, Rashmi Madhu, medical student2, Harry Hemingway, professor of clinical epidemiology3, Adam D Timmis, professor of clinical cardiology2
1 Newham University Hospital, London, 2 Barts and The London Queen Marys School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, 3 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London Medical School, London, 4 Unit of Academic Primary Health Care, University of Bristol
Correspondence to: A D Timmis, London Chest Hospital, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London E2 9JX adamtimmis{at}mac.com
Design Multicentre cohort study.
Setting Rapid access chest pain clinics of six hospitals in England.
Participants 8176 consecutive patients with suspected angina and no previous diagnosis of coronary artery disease, all of whom had a resting ECG recorded. 4848 patients with a summary exercise ECG result recorded (positive, negative, equivocal for ischaemia) comprised the summary ECG subset of whom 1422 with more detailed exercise ECG data recorded comprised the detailed ECG subset.
Main outcome measure Composite of death due to coronary heart disease or non-fatal acute coronary syndrome during median follow-up of 2.46 years.
Results Receiver operating characteristics curves for the basic clinical assessment model alone and with the results of resting ECGs were superimposed with little difference in the C statistic. With the exercise ECGs the C statistic in the summary ECG subset increased from 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.73) to 0.74 (0.71 to 0.76) and in the detailed ECG subset from 0.74 (0.70 to 0.79) to 0.78 (0.74 to 0.82). However, risk stratified cumulative probabilities of the primary end point at one year and six years for all three prognostic indices (clinical assessment only; clinical assessment plus resting ECG; clinical assessment plus resting ECG plus exercise ECG) showed only small differences at all time points and at all levels of risk.
Conclusion In ambulatory patients with suspected angina, basic clinical assessment encompasses nearly all the prognostic value of resting ECGs and most of the prognostic value of exercise ECGs. The limited incremental value of these widely applied tests emphasises the need for more effective methods of risk stratification in this group of patients.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses