Research

Positive and negative affect and risk of coronary heart disease: Whitehall II prospective cohort study

¹ Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, ² INSERM U687-IFR69, Villejuif, F-94807, France, ³ Hôpital Sainte Périne, Centre de Gérontologie, Paris, F-75781, France

Objective To examine the associations between positive and negative affect and subsequent coronary heart disease events independently of established risk factors.

Design Prospective cohort study with follow-up over 12 years.

Setting 20 civil service departments originally located in London.

Participants 10 308 civil servants aged 35-55 years at entry into Whitehall II study in 1985.

Main outcome measures Fatal coronary heart disease, clinically verified incident non-fatal myocardial infarction, and definite angina (n=619, mean follow-up 12.5 years).

Results In Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, and socioeconomic position, positive affect (hazard ratio=1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.82 to 1.24) and the balance between positive and negative affect, referred to as the affect balance score (hazard ratio=0.89, 0.73 to 1.09), were not associated with coronary heart disease. Further adjustment for behaviour related risk factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, daily fruit and vegetable intake, exercise, body mass index), biological risk factors (hypertension, blood cholesterol, diabetes), and psychological stress at work did not change these results. However, participants in the highest third of negative affect had an increased incidence of coronary events (hazard ratio=1.32, 1.09 to 1.60), and this association remained unchanged after adjustment for multiple confounders.

Conclusions Positive affect and affect balance did not seem to be predictive of future coronary heart disease in men and women who were free of diagnosed coronary heart disease at recruitment to the study. A weak positive association between negative affect and coronary heart disease was found and needs to be confirmed in further studies.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Affect and heart disease

Virginia W Chang
BMJ 2008 337: a177. [Extract] [Full Text]

Evidence based cardiology: Psychosocial factors in the aetiology and prognosis of coronary heart disease: systematic review of prospective cohort studies

Harry Hemingway and Michael Marmot
BMJ 1999 318: 1460-1467. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2008). Should Negative Affect Be Added to the List of Cardiac Risk Factors?. JWatch Emergency Med. 2008: 4-4 [Full text]  
• Chang, V. W (2008). Affect and heart disease. BMJ 337: a177-a177 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Does negative affectivity cause heart disease?

John Macleod, et al.
bmj.com, 7 Jul 2008 [Full text]

Psychological factors and CHD: reply to Macleod and Davey Smith

Hermann Nabi, et al.
bmj.com, 9 Jul 2008 [Full text]