Published 10 July 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a345
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a345

Research

Patients’ refusal to consent to storage and use of samples in Swedish biobanks: cross sectional study

Linus Johnsson, student1, Mats G Hansson, professor1, Stefan Eriksson, senior researcher1, Gert Helgesson, senior researcher2

1 Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Uppsala University, Uppsala Science Park, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden, 2 Unit for Bioethics, LIME, Karolinska Institutet, Berzelius väg 3, SE-171 77 Stockholm

Correspondence to: L Johnsson linus.johnsson{at}crb.uu.se

Objectives To estimate how many people object to storage of biological samples collected in health care in Sweden and to their use in research and how many withdraw previous consent.

Design Cross sectional study of register data.

Setting Biobanks used in Swedish health care, 2005-6.

Population Data on refusal to consent were obtained for 1.4 million biobank samples per year from 20 of 21 counties.

Main outcome measures Rates of preliminary refusal to consent, confirmed refusal, and withdrawal of consent.

Results Patients refused consent to either storage or use of their samples in about 1 in 690 cases; about 1 in 1600 confirmed their decision by completing a dissent form. Rather than having the samples destroyed, about 1 in 6200 patients wanted to restrict their use. Of those who had previously consented, about 1 in 19 000 withdrew their consent.

Conclusions Refusal to consent to biobank research in Sweden is rare, and the interests of individuals and research interests need not be at odds. The Swedish healthcare organisation is currently obliged to obtain either consent or refusal to each potential use of each sample taken, and lack of consent to research is used as the default position. A system of presumed consent with straightforward opt out would correspond with people’s attitudes, as expressed in their actions, towards biobank research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Opt-out from biobanks better respects patients’ autonomy
Linus Johnsson, Mats G Hansson, Stefan Eriksson, and Gert Helgesson
BMJ 2008 337: a1580. [Extract] [Full Text]

Evidence of support for biobanking practices
Graeme Laurie
BMJ 2008 337: a337. [Extract] [Full Text]

One-time general consent for research on biological samples
David Wendler
BMJ 2006 332: 544-547. [Full Text] [PDF]

Informed consent for genetic research on blood stored for more than a decade: a population based study
Birgitta Stegmayr and Kjell Asplund
BMJ 2002 325: 634-635. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Johnsson, L., Hansson, M. G, Eriksson, S., Helgesson, G. (2008). Opt-out from biobanks better respects patients' autonomy. BMJ 337: a1580-a1580 [Full text]  
  • Laurie, G. (2008). Evidence of support for biobanking practices. BMJ 337: a337-a337 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

An opt out system for tissue storage: lessons from Denmark
Klaus Hoeyer
bmj.com, 7 Oct 2008 [Full text]



Doc2Doc Vacancy
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ