Published 8 December 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2396
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2396

Research

Effects of algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trial

¹ Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, ² Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD, ³ Hull York Medical School, University of York, ⁴ Health Economics Research Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, ⁵ Department of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Stirling, ⁶ NHS Tayside, Kings Cross Hospital, Dundee DD3 8EA

Objective To compare the effectiveness of an algorithm for diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women with standard care in terms of maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Design Cluster randomised trial.

Setting Maternity units in Scotland with at least 800 annual births.

Participants 4503 women giving birth for the first time, in 14 maternity units. Seven experimental clusters collected data from a baseline sample of 1029 women and a post-implementation sample of 896 women. The seven control clusters had a baseline sample of 1291 women and a post-implementation sample of 1287 women.

Intervention Use of an algorithm by midwives to assist their diagnosis of active labour, compared with standard care.

Main outcomes Primary outcome: use of oxytocin for augmentation of labour. Secondary outcomes: medical interventions in labour, admission management, and birth outcome.

Results No significant difference was found between groups in percentage use of oxytocin for augmentation of labour (experimental minus control, difference=0.3, 95% confidence interval –9.2 to 9.8; P=0.9) or in the use of medical interventions in labour. Women in the algorithm group were more likely to be discharged from the labour suite after their first labour assessment (difference=–19.2, –29.9 to –8.6; P=0.002) and to have more pre-labour admissions (0.29, 0.04 to 0.55; P=0.03).

Conclusions Use of an algorithm to assist midwives with the diagnosis of active labour in primiparous women did not result in a reduction in oxytocin use or in medical intervention in spontaneous labour. Significantly more women in the experimental group were discharged home after their first labour ward assessment.

Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN00522952 [controlled-trials.com] .

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation

Alan Shiell, Penelope Hawe, and Lisa Gold
BMJ 2008 336: 1281-1283. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study

José Villar, Guillermo Carroli, Nelly Zavaleta, Allan Donner, Daniel Wojdyla, Anibal Faundes, Alejandro Velazco, Vicente Bataglia, Ana Langer, Alberto Narváez, Eliette Valladares, Archana Shah, Liana Campodónico, Mariana Romero, Sofia Reynoso, Karla Simônia de Pádua, Daniel Giordano, Marius Kublickas, Arnaldo Acosta World Health Organization 2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group
BMJ 2007 335: 1025. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions

Ann Oakley, Vicki Strange, Chris Bonell, Elizabeth Allen, Judith Stephenson RIPPLE Study Team
BMJ 2006 332: 413-416. [Full Text] [PDF]

Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success

Kensaku Kawamoto, Caitlin A Houlihan, E Andrew Balas, and David F Lobach
BMJ 2005 330: 765. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer?

David J Torgerson
BMJ 2001 322: 355-357. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Relation between private health insurance and high rates of caesarean section in Chile: qualitative and quantitative study

Susan F Murray
BMJ 2000 321: 1501-1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Minimisation: the platinum standard for trials?

Tom Treasure and Kenneth D MacRae
BMJ 1998 317: 362-363. [Extract] [Full Text]

Midwife managed delivery unit: a randomised controlled comparison with consultant led care

V A Hundley, F M Cruickshank, G D Lang, C M A Glazener, J M Milne, M Turner, D Blyth, J Mollison, and C Donaldson
BMJ 1994 309: 1400-1404. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Research into effective care in early labour: Where do we go from here?

Mechthild M Gross
bmj.com, 12 Dec 2008 [Full text]

labour -diagnosis

koneru gangadhara rao, et al.
bmj.com, 30 Dec 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>