Published 4 December 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a2533
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a2533

Research

Detecting implausible social network effects in acne, height, and headaches: longitudinal analysis

Ethan Cohen-Cole, financial economist1, Jason M Fletcher, assistant professor2

1 Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, MA 02210, USA, 2 Yale University, School of Public Health, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT 06510

Correspondence to: J Fletcher jason.fletcher{at}yale.edu

Objective To investigate whether "network effects" can be detected for health outcomes that are unlikely to be subject to network phenomena.

Design Statistical analysis common in network studies, such as logistic regression analysis, controlled for own and friend’s lagged health status. Analyses controlled for environmental confounders.

Setting Subsamples of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health (Add Health).

Participants 4300 to 5400 male and female adolescents who nominated a friend in the dataset and who were both longitudinally surveyed.

Measurements Health outcomes, including headache severity, acne severity, and height self reported by respondents in 1994-5, 1995-6, and 2000-1.

Results Significant network effects were observed in the acquisition of acne, headaches, and height. A friend’s acne problems increased an individual’s odds of acne problems (odds ratio 1.62, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 2.89). The likelihood that an individual had headaches also increased with the presence of a friend with headaches (1.47, 0.93 to 2.33); and an individual’s height increased by 20% of his or her friend’s height (0.18, 0.15 to 0.26). Each of these results was estimated by using standard methods found in several publications. After adjustment for environmental confounders, however, the results become uniformly smaller and insignificant.

Conclusions Researchers should be cautious in attributing correlations in health outcomes of close friends to social network effects, especially when environmental confounders are not adequately controlled for in the analysis.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Networking for health
Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 337: a3153. [Extract] [Full Text]

Happiness, social networks, and health
Andrew Steptoe and Ana V Diez Roux
BMJ 2008 337: a2781. [Extract] [Full Text]

Sifting the evidence---what's wrong with significance tests? Another comment on the role of statistical methods
Jonathan A C Sterne, George Davey Smith, and D R Cox
BMJ 2001 322: 226-231. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • (2009). With a Little Help from My Friends: The Happiness Effect. JWatch Psychiatry 2009: 1-1 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ