Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
Published 31 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1331
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1331
Christoph Stettler, senior research fellow1,2,3, Sabin Allemann, research fellow1,2, Simon Wandel, research fellow1, Adnan Kastrati, professor of cardiology4, Marie Claude Morice, professor of cardiology5, Albert Schömig, professor of medicine4, Matthias E Pfisterer, professor of cardiology6, Gregg W Stone, professor of medicine7, Martin B Leon, professor of medicine 7, José Suárez de Lezo, professor of cardiology8, Jean-Jacques Goy, professor of interventional cardiology9, Seung-Jung Park, professor of cardiology10, Manel Sabaté, associate professor of cardiology11, Maarten J Suttorp, head of department 12, Henning Kelbaek, associate professor of cardiology 13, Christian Spaulding, professor of cardiology 14, Maurizio Menichelli, interventional cardiologist15, Paul Vermeersch, interventional cardiologist16, Maurits T Dirksen, training fellow in cardiology17, Pavel Cervinka, cardiologist18, Marco De Carlo, vice director19, Andrejs Erglis, associate professor of cardiology20, Tania Chechi, interventional cardiologist21, Paolo Ortolani, interventional cardiologist22, Martin J Schalij, professor of cardiology23, Peter Diem, head of division 2, Bernhard Meier, professor of cardiology24, Stephan Windecker, head of invasive cardiology 24,25, Peter Jüni, head of division 1,25
1 Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland, 2 Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland, 3 International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, 4 Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität, Munich, Germany, 5 Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier, Massy, France, 6 Division of Cardiology, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, 7 Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA, 8 Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain, 9 Service of Cardiology, Clinique Cecil, Lausanne, Switzerland, 10 Department of Medicine, ASAN Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, 11 Department of Interventional Cardiology, Hospital de San Pau, Barcelona, Spain, 12 Department of Interventional Cardiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Netherlands, 13 Cardiac Catheterisation Laboratory, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, 14 Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, and INSERM U 780, Paris, France, 15 San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy, 16 Antwerp Cardiovascular Institute Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium, 17 Amsterdam Department of Interventional Cardiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 18 Division of Cardiology, Masaryk Hospital, Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic, 19 Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Italy, 20 University of Latvia, Institute of Cardiology, Riga, Latvia, 21 Cardiologia e Cardiologia Invasiva 2–AOU-Careggi, Florence, Italy, 22 Institute of Cardiology, S Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Italy, 23 Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 24 Department of Cardiology, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland, 25 CTU Bern, Bern University Hospital, 3010 Bern, Switzerland
Correspondence to: P Jüni juni{at}ispm.unibe.ch
Design Collaborative network meta-analysis.
Data sources Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), relevant websites, reference lists, conference abstracts, reviews, book chapters, and proceedings of advisory panels for the US Food and Drug Administration. Manufacturers and trialists provided additional data.
Review methods Network meta-analysis with a mixed treatment comparison method to combine direct within trial comparisons between stents with indirect evidence from other trials while maintaining randomisation. Overall mortality was the primary safety end point, target lesion revascularisation the effectiveness end point.
Results 35 trials in 3852 people with diabetes and 10 947 people without diabetes contributed to the analyses. Inconsistency of the network was substantial for overall mortality in people with diabetes and seemed to be related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (P value for interaction 0.02). Restricting the analysis to trials with a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more, inconsistency was reduced considerably and hazard ratios for overall mortality were near one for all comparisons in people with diabetes: sirolimus eluting stents compared with bare metal stents 0.88 (95% credibility interval 0.55 to 1.30), paclitaxel eluting stents compared with bare metal stents 0.91 (0.60 to 1.38), and sirolimus eluting stents compared with paclitaxel eluting stents 0.95 (0.63 to 1.43). In people without diabetes, hazard ratios were unaffected by the restriction. Both drug eluting stents were associated with a decrease in revascularisation rates compared with bare metal stents in people both with and without diabetes.
Conclusion In trials that specified a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more after stent implantation, drug eluting stents seemed safe and effective in people both with and without diabetes.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?