Published 28 August 2008, doi:10.1136/bmj.a1021
Cite this as: BMJ 2008;337:a1021

Research

Effect on birth outcomes of a formalised approach to care in hospital labour assessment units: international, randomised controlled trial

¹ Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5T 1P8, ² Program in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, and Research Institute at SickKids, SickKids Hospital, Toronto, Canada, ³ Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, 155 College St, Toronto, ON, Canada, M5T 3M7, ⁴ University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, School of Nursing, Denver, CO, USA, ⁵ Labor and Delivery, St John’s Mercy Medical Center, St Louis, MO, USA, ⁶ Université de Montréal, Département d’obstétrique-gynécologie, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry, Montréal, QC, Canada, ⁷ Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Centre for Health Economics and Policy Evaluation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Objective To determine if a complex nursing and midwifery intervention in hospital labour assessment units would increase the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth and improve other maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Design Multicentre, randomised controlled trial with prognostic stratification by hospital.

Setting 20 North American and UK hospitals.

Participants 5002 nulliparous women experiencing contractions but not in active labour; 2501 were allocated to structured care and 2501 to usual care.

Interventions Usual nursing or midwifery care or a minimum of one hour of care by a nurse or midwife trained in structured care, consisting of a formalised approach to assessment of and interventions for maternal emotional state, pain, and fetal position.

Main outcome measures Primary outcome was spontaneous vaginal birth. Other outcomes included intrapartum interventions, women’s views of their care, and indicators of maternal and fetal health during hospital stay and 6-8 weeks after discharge.

Results Outcome data were obtained for 4996 women. The rate of spontaneous vaginal birth was 64.0% (n=1597) in the structured care group and 61.3% (n=1533) in the usual care group (odds ratio 1.12, 95% confidence interval 0.96 to 1.27). Fewer women allocated to structured care (n=403, 19.5%) rated staff helpfulness as less than very helpful than those allocated to usual care (n=544, 26.4%); odds ratio 0.67, 98.75% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.85. Fewer women allocated to structured care (n=233, 11.3%) were disappointed with the amount of attention received from staff than those allocated to usual care (n=407, 19.7%); odds ratio 0.51, 98.75% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.70. None of the other results met prespecified levels of statistical significance.

Conclusion A structured approach to care in hospital labour assessment units increased satisfaction with care and was suggestive of a modest increase in the likelihood of spontaneous vaginal birth. Further study to strengthen the intervention is warranted.

Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN16315180 [controlled-trials.com] .

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Achieving the best from care in early labour

Helen Spiby and Mary J Renfrew
BMJ 2008 337: a1165. [Extract] [Full Text]

Designing and evaluating complex interventions to improve health care

Neil C Campbell, Elizabeth Murray, Janet Darbyshire, Jon Emery, Andrew Farmer, Frances Griffiths, Bruce Guthrie, Helen Lester, Phil Wilson, and Ann Louise Kinmonth
BMJ 2007 334: 455-459. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be?

Penelope Hawe, Alan Shiell, and Therese Riley
BMJ 2004 328: 1561-1563. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Why do we need randomised controlled trials to assess behavioural interventions?

Judith Stephenson and John Imrie
BMJ 1998 316: 611-613. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Spiby, H., Renfrew, M. J (2008). Achieving the best from care in early labour. BMJ 337: a1165-a1165 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

‘Usual’ nursing or midwifery care are unlikely to be the same.

Edwin R. van Teijlingen, et al.
bmj.com, 1 Sep 2008 [Full text]

Re: ‘Usual’ nursing or midwifery care are unlikely to be the same.

Ellen D. Hodnett
bmj.com, 3 Sep 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more on doc2doc >>