Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2008;336:1355-1358 (14 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.a143 (published 23 May 2008)
Wilco C Peul, neurosurgeon, epidemiologist1,2, Wilbert B van den Hout, health economist3, Ronald Brand, statistician4, Ralph T W M Thomeer, head of department1, Bart W Koes, head of department5, for the Leiden-The Hague Spine Intervention Prognostic Study Group
1 Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, PO Box 9600, 2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands, 2 Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Centre Haaglanden, The Hague, Netherlands, 3 Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Centre, 4 Department of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, 5 Research Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Centre, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Correspondence to: W C Peul w.c.peul{at}lumc.nl
Design Randomised controlled trial.
Setting Nine Dutch hospitals.
Participants 283 patients with 6-12 weeks of sciatica.
Interventions Early surgery or an intended six months of continued conservative treatment, with delayed surgery if needed.
Main outcome measures Scores from Roland disability questionnaire for sciatica, visual analogue scale for leg pain, and Likert self rating scale of global perceived recovery.
Results Of the 141 patients assigned to undergo early surgery, 125 (89%) underwent microdiscectomy. Of the 142 patients assigned to conservative treatment, 62 (44%) eventually required surgery, seven doing so in the second year of follow-up. There was no significant overall difference between treatment arms in disability scores during the first two years (P=0.25). Improvement in leg pain was faster for patients randomised to early surgery, with a significant difference between "areas under the curves" over two years (P=0.05). This short term benefit of early surgery was no longer significant by six months and continued to narrow between six months and 24 months. Patient satisfaction decreased slightly between one and two years for both groups. At two years 20% of all patients reported an unsatisfactory outcome.
Conclusions Early surgery achieved more rapid relief of sciatica than conservative care, but outcomes were similar by one year and these did not change during the second year.
Trial Registry ISRCT No 26872154.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses