BMJ  2008;336:1117-1120 (17 May), doi:10.1136/bmj.39540.522049.BE (published 14 May 2008)

Research

Accuracy of mean arterial pressure and blood pressure measurements in predicting pre-eclampsia: systematic review and meta-analysis

¹ Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 15, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, Netherlands, ² Horten Center, University of Zurich, Switzerland, ³ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, ⁴ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands, ⁵ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Birmingham Womens Hospital, Birmingham

Objective To determine the accuracy of using systolic and diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, and increase of blood pressure to predict pre-eclampsia.

Design Systematic review with meta-analysis of data on test accuracy.

Data sources Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medion, checking reference lists of included articles and reviews, contact with authors.

Review methods Without language restrictions, two reviewers independently selected the articles in which the accuracy of blood pressure measurement during pregnancy was evaluated to predict pre-eclampsia. Data were extracted on study characteristics, quality, and results to construct 2x2 tables. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios were generated for the various levels and their thresholds.

Results 34 studies, testing 60 599 women (3341 cases of pre-eclampsia), were included. In women at low risk for pre-eclampsia, the areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves for blood pressure measurement in the second trimester were 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.64 to 0.72) for systolic blood pressure, 0.66 (0.59 to 0.72) for diastolic blood pressure, and 0.76 (0.70 to 0.82) for mean arterial pressure. Findings for the first trimester showed a similar pattern. Second trimester mean arterial pressure of 90 mm Hg or more showed a positive likelihood ratio of 3.5 (95% confidence interval 2.0 to 5.0) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.46 (0.16 to 0.75). In women deemed to be at high risk, a diastolic blood pressure of 75 mm Hg or more at 13 to 20 weeks’ gestation best predicted pre-eclampsia: positive likelihood ratio 2.8 (1.8 to 3.6), negative likelihood ratio 0.39 (0.18 to 0.71). Additional subgroup analyses did not show improved predictive accuracy.

Conclusion When blood pressure is measured in the first or second trimester of pregnancy, the mean arterial pressure is a better predictor for pre-eclampsia than systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or an increase of blood pressure.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Responding to disasters

Fiona Godlee
BMJ 2008 336: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Mean arterial pressure and prediction of pre-eclampsia

Colin A Walsh and Laxmi V Baxi
BMJ 2008 336: 1079-1080. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies

Kirsten Duckitt and Deborah Harrington
BMJ 2005 330: 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios

Jonathan J Deeks and Douglas G Altman
BMJ 2004 329: 168-169. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Walsh, C. A, Baxi, L. V (2008). Mean arterial pressure and prediction of pre-eclampsia. BMJ 336: 1079-1080 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Absence of mid-pregnancy drop in prediction of preeclampsia: A myth?!

Wietske Hermes, et al.
bmj.com, 15 Aug 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>