BMJ  2008;336:816-818 (12 April), doi:10.1136/bmj.39518.463206.25 (published 3 April 2008)

Research

Effect of high throughput RHD typing of fetal DNA in maternal plasma on use of anti-RhD immunoglobulin in RhD negative pregnant women: prospective feasibility study

¹ International Blood Group Reference Laboratory, NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol BS10 5ND, ² NHS Blood and Transplant, Bristol

Objectives To assess the feasibility of applying a high throughput method, with an automated robotic technique, for predicting fetal RhD phenotype from fetal DNA in the plasma of RhD negative pregnant women to avoid unnecessary treatment with anti-RhD immunoglobulin.

Design Prospective comparison of fetal RHD genotype determined from fetal DNA in maternal plasma with the serologically determined fetal RhD phenotype from cord blood.

Setting Antenatal clinics and antenatal testing laboratories in the Midlands and north of England and an international blood group reference laboratory.

Participants Pregnant women of known gestation identified as RhD negative by an antenatal testing laboratory. Samples from 1997 women were taken at or before the 28 week antenatal visit.

Main outcome measures Detection rate of fetal RhD from maternal plasma, error rate, false positive rate, and the odds of being affected given a positive result.

Results Serologically determined RhD phenotypes were obtained from 1869 cord blood samples. In 95.7% (n=1788) the correct fetal RhD phenotype was predicted by the genotyping tests. In 3.4% (n=64) results were either unobtainable or inconclusive. A false positive result was obtained in 0.8% (14 samples), probably because of unexpressed or weakly expressed fetal RHD genes. In only three samples (0.2%) were false negative results obtained. If these results had been applied as a guide to treatment, only 2% of the women would have received anti-RhD unnecessarily, compared with 38% without the genotyping.

Conclusions High throughput RHD genotyping of fetuses in all RhD negative women is feasible and would substantially reduce unnecessary administration of anti-RhD immunoglobulin to RhD negative pregnant women with an RhD negative fetus.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Articles

Is fetal RHD typing in all RhD negative women cost effective?

Ala Szczepura, Gouke Bonsel, Christian Krauth, Leeza Osipenko, and Alexander Haverkamp
BMJ 2008 336: 906. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Universal RHD genotyping in fetuses

Sailesh Kumar
BMJ 2008 336: 783-784. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Management of pregnancies with RhD alloimmunisation

Sailesh Kumar and Fiona Regan
BMJ 2005 330: 1255-1258. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Preventing RhD haemolytic disease of the newborn

Douglas Lee, J S Craig, B G McClure, and T R J Tubman
BMJ 1998 316: 1611. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2008). Test Mom for Fetal DNA and Save an Anti-RhD Ig Shot. JWatch Women's Health 2008: 2-2 [Full text]  
• Szczepura, A., Bonsel, G., Krauth, C., Osipenko, L., Haverkamp, A. (2008). Is fetal RHD typing in all RhD negative women cost effective?. BMJ 336: 906-906 [Full text]  
• Kumar, S. (2008). Universal RHD genotyping in fetuses. BMJ 336: 783-784 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Universal Fetal Genotyping of RHD Negative Pregnancies– How Cost-Effective?

Ala Szczepura, et al.
bmj.com, 17 Apr 2008 [Full text]

Universal Fetal RHD Genotyping of RhD-negative Pregnancies – How Cost Effective?

Geoff Daniels, et al.
bmj.com, 27 Apr 2008 [Full text]