BMJ  2007;335:1313-1315 (22 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39420.533461.25

History

Enduring beliefs about effects of gassing in war: qualitative study

Edgar Jones, professor1, Ian Palmer, professor2, Simon Wessely, professor1

1 Institute of Psychiatry and King’s Centre for Military Health Research, Weston Education Centre, London SE5 9RJ, 2 Medical Assessment Programme, St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH

Correspondence to: E Jones edgar.jones{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk

Objectives To discover the content of enduring beliefs held by first world war veterans about their experience of having been gassed.

Design Collection and thematic analysis of written and reported statements from a sample of veterans about gassing.

Subjects 103 veterans with a war pension.

Results Twelve themes were identified, which were related to individual statements. The systemic nature of chemical weapons played a key part in ideas and beliefs about their capacity to cause enduring harm to health. Unlike shrapnel or a bullet that had a defined physical presence, gas had unseen effects within the body, while its capacity to cause damage was apparent from vesicant effects to skin and eyes. The terror inspired by chemical weapons also served to maintain memories of being gassed, while anti-gas measures were themselves disconcerting or a source of discomfort.

Conclusions Chronic symptoms and work difficulties maintained beliefs about the potency of chemical weapons. In the period after the war, gas continued to inspire popular revulsion and was associated with a sense of unfairness.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Knowledge of chemical warfare injuries
Jan Schumacher, et al.
bmj.com, 29 Dec 2007 [Full text]
Doc2Doc Vacancy
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ