BMJ  2007;335:1190-1194 (8 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.39402.463854.AE (published 30 November 2007)

Research

New point of care Chlamydia Rapid Test—bridging the gap between diagnosis and treatment: performance evaluation study

¹ Diagnostics for the Real World (Europe) Ltd, Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge CB4 0WG, ² University of Cambridge, Department of Haematology, Diagnostics Development Unit, EABC Site, Long Road, Cambridge CB2 2PT, ³ Sexually Transmitted Bacteria Reference Laboratory, Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London NW9 5HT, ⁴ Brook in Birmingham, 56-61 John Bright Street, Birmingham B1 1BL, ⁵ Barts and The London NHS Trust, London E1 1BB

Objective To evaluate the performance of a new Chlamydia Rapid Test with vaginal swab specimens as a potential tool for chlamydia diagnosis and screening.

Design Performance evaluation study.

Settings A young people’s sexual health centre (site 1) and two genitourinary medicine clinics (sites 2 and 3) in the United Kingdom.

Participants 1349 women aged between 16 and 54 attending one of the three clinics.

Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Chlamydia Rapid Test versus polymerase chain reaction and strand displacement amplification assays; correlation between the Chlamydia Rapid Test visual signal and organism load; acceptability to participants of self collected vaginal swabs as the specimen type for Chlamydia testing.

Results Polymerase chain reaction positivity rates for Chlamydia trachomatis infection were 8.4% (56/663) at site 1, 9.4% (36/385) at site 2, and 6.0% (18/301) at site 3. Compared with polymerase chain reaction assay, the resolved sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Chlamydia Rapid Test were 83.5% (91/109), 98.9% (1224/1238), 86.7% (91/105), and 98.6% (1224/1242). Compared with strand displacement amplification assay, sensitivity and specificity of the Chlamydia Rapid Test were 81.6% (40/49) and 98.3% (578/588). Organism load of self collected vaginal swabs ranged from 5.97x10² to 1.09x10⁹ Chlamydia plasmids per swab, which correlated well with the Chlamydia Rapid Test’s visual signal (r=0.6435, P<0.0001). Most (95.9%) surveyed participants felt comfortable about collecting their own swabs.

Conclusions The performance of the Chlamydia Rapid Test with self collected vaginal swabs indicates that it would be an effective same day diagnostic and screening tool for Chlamydia infection in women. The availability of Chlamydia Rapid Test results within 30 minutes allows for immediate treatment and contact tracing, potentially reducing the risks of persistent infection and onward transmission. It could also provide a simple and reliable alternative to nucleic acid amplification tests in chlamydia screening programmes.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Performance evaluation of a new rapid urine test for chlamydia in men: prospective cohort study

Elpidio-Cesar Nadala, Beng T Goh, Jose-Paolo Magbanua, Penelope Barber, Alison Swain, Sarah Alexander, Vivian Laitila, Claude-Edouard Michel, Lourdes Mahilum-Tapay, Ines Ushiro-Lumb, Catherine Ison, and Helen H Lee
BMJ 2009 339: b2655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Nadala, E.-C., Goh, B. T, Magbanua, J.-P., Barber, P., Swain, A., Alexander, S., Laitila, V., Michel, C.-E., Mahilum-Tapay, L., Ushiro-Lumb, I., Ison, C., Lee, H. H (2009). Performance evaluation of a new rapid urine test for chlamydia in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ 339: b2655-b2655 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Gaydos, C. A (2009). Can we climb out of the "pit" of poorly performing rapid diagnostic tests for chlamydia?. Sex. Transm. Infect. 85: 158-158 [Full text]  
• Michel, C-E C, Saison, F G, Joshi, H, Mahilum-Tapay, L M, Lee, H H (2009). Pitfalls of internet-accessible diagnostic tests: inadequate performance of a CE-marked Chlamydia test for home use. Sex. Transm. Infect. 85: 187-189 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• (2008). New Vaginal Swab Test for Chlamydia Yields Accurate Results in 30 Minutes. JWatch Emergency Med. 2008: 1-1 [Full text]  
• (2007). New Rapid Chlamydia Test. JWatch Women's Health 2007: 1-1 [Full text]  
• (2007). New Rapid Test for Chlamydia. JWatch Infect. Diseases 2007: 6-6 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Cost-effectiveness considerations for this test

Wiley D. Jenkins
bmj.com, 4 Dec 2007 [Full text]

Chlamydia Rapid Test Vs Syndromic Manangement-Cost effectiveness in Resource Poor Setting.

Olufunso S Ojo
bmj.com, 5 Dec 2007 [Full text]

Chlamydia Rapid Test and False Negatives

Souhail Alouini
bmj.com, 9 Dec 2007 [Full text]

Sensitivity vs negative predictive value

yogi sehgal
bmj.com, 24 Feb 2008 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>