Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:919 (3 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.39343.649097.55 (published 4 October 2007)
Suzanne Mason, reader in emergency medicine1, Emma Knowles, research fellow1, Brigitte Colwell, research associate1, Simon Dixon, senior lecturer3, Jim Wardrope, consultant in emergency medicine2, Robert Gorringe, lead emergency care practitioner4, Helen Snooks, professor of health services research5, Julie Perrin, nurse consultant in emergency medicine2, Jon Nicholl, professor1
1 Health Services Research, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, 2 Department of Emergency Medicine, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals Trust, Sheffield S5 7AU, 3 Health Economics and Decision Science, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, 4 South Yorkshire Ambulance Service, Rotherham S60 2BQ, 5 Centre for Health Information Research and Evaluation, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP
Correspondence to: S Mason s.mason{at}sheffield.ac.uk
Design Cluster randomised controlled trial involving 56 clusters. Weeks were randomised to the paramedic practitioner service being active (intervention) or inactive (control) when the standard 999 service was available.
Setting A large urban area in England.
Participants 3018 patients aged over 60 who called the emergency services (n=1549 intervention, n=1469 control).
Main outcome measures Emergency department attendance or hospital admission between 0 and 28 days; interval from time of call to time of discharge; patients' satisfaction with the service received.
Results Overall, patients in the intervention group were less likely to attend an emergency department (relative risk 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 0.75) or require hospital admission within 28 days (0.87, 0.81 to 0.94) and experienced a shorter total episode time (235 v 278 minutes, 95% confidence interval for difference –60 minutes to –25 minutes). Patients in the intervention group were more likely to report being highly satisfied with their healthcare episode (relative risk 1.16, 1.09 to 1.23). There was no significant difference in 28 day mortality (0.87, 0.63 to 1.21).
Conclusions Paramedics with extended skills can provide a clinically effective alternative to standard ambulance transfer and treatment in an emergency department for elderly patients with acute minor conditions.
Trial registration ISRCTN27796329 [controlled-trials.com] .
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.