BMJ  2007;335:869 (27 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.39339.448819.AE (published 22 October 2007)

Research

Rapid tranquillisation in psychiatric emergency settings in Brazil: pragmatic randomised controlled trial of intramuscular haloperidol versus intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine

Gisele Huf, associate professor1, E S F Coutinho, professor2, C E Adams, associate professor3, TREC Collaborative Group

1 National Institute of Quality Control in Health (INCQS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Av Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, 21040-900, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2 National School of Public Health (ENSP), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), 3 Division of Psychiatry, University of Nottingham, Nottingham

Correspondence to: G Huf  gisele{at}ensp.fiocruz.br

Objective To determine whether haloperidol alone results in swifter and safer tranquillisation and sedation than haloperidol plus promethazine.

Design Pragmatic randomised open trial (January-July 2004).

Setting Psychiatric emergency room, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Participants 316 patients who needed urgent intramuscular sedation because of agitation, dangerous behaviour, or both.

Interventions Open treatment with intramuscular haloperidol 5-10 mg or intramuscular haloperidol 5-10 mg plus intramuscular promethazine up to 50 mg; doses were at the discretion of the prescribing clinician.

Main outcome measures The primary outcome was proportion tranquil or asleep by 20 minutes. Secondary outcomes were asleep by 20 minutes; tranquil or asleep by 40, 60, and 120 minutes; physically restrained or given additional drugs within 2 hours; severe adverse events; another episode of agitation or aggression; additional visit from the doctor during the subsequent 24 hours; overall antipsychotic load in the first 24 hours; and still in hospital after 2 weeks.

Results Primary outcome data were available for 311 (98.4%) people, 77% of whom were thought to have a psychotic illness. Patients allocated haloperidol plus promethazine were more likely to be tranquil or asleep by 20 minutes than those who received intramuscular haloperidol alone (relative risk 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.10 to 1.55; number needed to treat 6, 95% confidence interval 4 to 16; P=0.002). No differences were found after 20 minutes. However, 10 cases of acute dystonia occurred, all in the haloperidol alone group.

Conclusions Haloperidol plus promethazine is a better option than haloperidol alone in terms of speed of onset of action and safety. Enough data are now available to change guidelines that continue to recommend treatments that leave people exposed to longer periods of aggression than necessary and patients vulnerable to distressing and unsafe adverse effects.

Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN83261243 [controlled-trials.com] .


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Make health inequality history
Trish Groves
BMJ 2007 335: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Rapid tranquillisation in emergency psychiatric settings
Chittaranjan Andrade
BMJ 2007 335: 835-836. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid tranquillisation for agitated patients in emergency psychiatric rooms: a randomised trial of midazolam versus haloperidol plus promethazine
BMJ 2003 327: 708-713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Fortnightly review: Acute dystonia induced by drug treatment
Peter N van Harten, Hans W Hoek, and Rene S Kahn
BMJ 1999 319: 623-626. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Stroup, T. S., Geddes, J. R. (2008). Randomized Controlled Trials for Schizophrenia: Study Designs Targeted to Distinct Goals. Schizophr Bull 34: 266-274 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Adams, C. E., Coutinho, E. S. F., Davis, J., Duggan, L., Leucht, S., Li, C., Tharyan, P. (2008). Cochrane Schizophrenia Group. Schizophr Bull 34: 259-265 [Full text]  
  • (2007). Acute Sedation of Violent Psychiatric Patients. JWatch Emergency Med. 2007: 2-2 [Full text]  
  • Raveendran, N. S, Tharyan, P., Alexander, J., Adams, C. E., TREC-India II Collaborative Group, (2007). Rapid tranquillisation in psychiatric emergency settings in India: pragmatic randomised controlled trial of intramuscular olanzapine versus intramuscular haloperidol plus promethazine. BMJ 335: 865-865 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Andrade, C. (2007). Rapid tranquillisation in emergency psychiatric settings. BMJ 335: 835-836 [Full text]  



Doc2Doc Vacancy
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ