Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;335:497 (8 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.39314.620174.80 (published 30 August 2007)
Dean T Eurich, research associate1, Finlay A McAlister, associate professor2, David F Blackburn, assistant professor3, Sumit R Majumdar, associate professor2, Ross T Tsuyuki, professor4, Janice Varney, librarian1, Jeffrey A Johnson, professor5
1 Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T5J 3N4, 2 Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, 2F1 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2B7, 3 College of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada, S7N 5C9, 4 Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, 2F1 WMC, University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2B7, 5 Department of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2G3
Correspondence to: J A Johnson jeff.johnson{at}ualberta.ca
Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies (randomised trials or cohort studies) evaluating antidiabetic agents and outcomes (death and admission to hospital) in patients with heart failure and diabetes.
Data sources Electronic databases, manual reference search, and contact with investigators.
Review methods Two reviewers independently extracted data. Risk estimates for specific treatments were abstracted and pooled estimates derived by meta-analysis where appropriate.
Results Eight studies were included. Three of four studies found that insulin use was associated with increased risk for all cause mortality (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.51; 3.42, 1.40 to 8.37 in studies that did not adjust for diet and antidiabetic drugs; hazard ratio 1.66, 1.20 to 2.31; 0.96, 0.88 to 1.05 in the studies that did). Metformin was associated with significantly reduced all cause mortality in two studies (hazard ratio 0.86, 0.78 to 0.97) compared with other antidiabetic drugs and insulin; 0.70, 0.54 to 0.91 compared with sulfonylureas); a similar trend was seen in a third. Metformin was not associated with increased hospital admission for any cause or for heart failure specifically. In four studies, use of thiazolidinediones was associated with reduced all cause mortality (pooled odds ratio 0.83, 0.71 to 0.97, I2=52%, P=0.02). Thiazolidinediones were associated with increased risk of hospital admission for heart failure (pooled odds ratio 1.13 (1.04 to 1.22), I2=0%, P=0.004). The two studies of sulfonylureas had conflicting results, probably because of differences in comparator treatments. Important limitations were noted in all studies.
Conclusion Metformin was the only antidiabetic agent not associated with harm in patients with heart failure and diabetes. It was associated with reduced all cause mortality in two of the three studies.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
UK medical students have published unreleased government plans to restrict failed asylum seekers' access to medical care