BMJ  2007;335:244 (4 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.39248.634977.AE (published 13 July 2007)

Research

Dressings for venous leg ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis

¹ Sheffield Vascular Institute, Northern General Hospital, Sheffield S5 7AU, ² School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9UT

Objective To review the evidence of effectiveness of dressings applied to venous leg ulcers.

Design Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources Hand searches of journals and searches of electronic databases, conference proceedings, and bibliographies up to April 2006; contacts with dressing manufacturers for unpublished studies.

Studies reviewed All randomised controlled trials that evaluated dressings applied to venous leg ulcers were eligible for inclusion. Data from eligible studies were extracted and summarised independently by two reviewers using a data extraction sheet. Methodological quality was assessed independently by two reviewers.

Results The search strategy identified 254 studies; 42 of these fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Hydrocolloids were no more effective than simple low adherent dressings used beneath compression (eight trials; relative risk for healing with hydrocolloid 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.28). For other comparisons, insufficient evidence was available to allow firm conclusions to be drawn. None of the dressing comparisons showed evidence that a particular class of dressing healed more ulcers. Some differences existed between dressings in terms of subjective outcome measures and ulcer healing rates. The results were not affected by the size or quality of trials or the unit of randomisation. Insufficient data were available to allow conclusions to be drawn about the relative cost effectiveness of different dressings.

Conclusions The type of dressing applied beneath compression was not shown to affect ulcer healing. The results of the meta-analysis showed that applying hydrocolloid dressings beneath compression produced no benefit in terms of ulcer healing compared with applying simple low adherent dressings. No conclusive recommendations can be made as to which type of dressing is most cost effective. Decisions on which dressing to apply should be based on the local costs of dressings and the preferences of the practitioner or patient.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

A systematic review of compression treatment for venous leg ulcers

Alison Fletcher, Nicky Cullum, and Trevor A Sheldon
BMJ 1997 315: 576-580. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Moore, Z. (2008). Honey-impregnated dressings and usual care did not differ for healing venous leg ulcers. Evid. Based Nurs. 11: 87-87 [Full text]  
• (2007). Which Dressing for Venous Leg Ulcers?. JWatch General 2007: 4-4 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Evidence controversy in wound management

Finn Gottrup
bmj.com, 3 Mar 2008 [Full text]