BMJ  2007;334:576 (17 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39118.483819.55 (published 2 March 2007)

Research

Birth order of twins and risk of perinatal death related to delivery in England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994-2003: retrospective cohort study

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cambridge University, Box 223, The Rosie Hospital, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, ² Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health, London NW1 5SD, ³ Medical Research Council Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Cambridge CB2 2SR

Objective To determine the effect of birth order on the risk of perinatal death in twin pregnancies.

Design Retrospective cohort study.

Setting England, Northern Ireland, and Wales, 1994-2003.

Participants 1377 twin pregnancies with one intrapartum stillbirth or neonatal death from causes other than congenital abnormality and one surviving infant.

Main outcome measures The risk of perinatal death in the first and second twin estimated with conditional logistic regression.

Results There was no association between birth order and the risk of death overall (odds ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval 0.9 to 1.1). However, there was a highly significant interaction with gestational age (P<0.001). There was no association between birth order and the risk of death among infants born before 36 weeks' gestation but there was an increased risk of death among second twins born at term (2.3, 1.7 to 3.2, P<0.001), which was stronger for deaths caused by intrapartum anoxia or trauma (3.4, 2.2 to 5.3). Among term births, there was a trend (P=0.1) towards a greater risk of the second twin dying from anoxia among those delivered vaginally (4.1, 1.8 to 9.5) compared with those delivered by caesarean section (1.8, 0.9 to 3.6).

Conclusions In this cohort, compared with first twins, second twins born at term were at increased risk of perinatal death related to delivery. Vaginally delivered second twins had a fourfold risk of death caused by intrapartum anoxia.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Author's reply on absolute risk

Gordon C S Smith
BMJ 2007 334: 762. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Absolute risk: better basis for decision making

Christopher Cheetham
BMJ 2007 334: 651-652. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

It's all about being first

Elizabeth Loder
BMJ 2007 334: 0. [Extract] [Full Text]

Perinatal death in twins

Philip Steer
BMJ 2007 334: 545-546. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Birth order, gestational age, and risk of delivery related perinatal death in twins: retrospective cohort study

Gordon C S Smith, Jill P Pell, and Richard Dobbie
BMJ 2002 325: 1004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• (2007). The Problem with Being Second. JWatch Pediatrics 2007: 1-1 [Full text]  
• Smith, G. C S (2007). Perinatal death in twins. Author's reply on absolute risk.. BMJ 334: 762-762 [Full text]  
• Cheetham, C. (2007). Absolute risk: better basis for decision making. BMJ 334: 651-652 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

The second twin seems more likely to survive when an absolute risk is calculated

Christopher H Cheetham
bmj.com, 19 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Experienced accoucheur for twin vaginal delivery

Bode Williams
bmj.com, 21 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Perinatal death in twins: Term vaginal delivery vs. Caesarean Section:

Shachi mudgal, et al.
bmj.com, 23 Mar 2007 [Full text]

Interpret study sample with caution

Deirdre J Murphy
bmj.com, 3 Apr 2007 [Full text]

Twins, birth order and the risk of perinatal death

Gordon CS Smith
bmj.com, 2 Apr 2007 [Full text]

Birth order and the risk of perinatal death in twins

Gordon CS Smith
bmj.com, 5 Apr 2007 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>