Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:524 (10 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39097.508426.BE (published 2 February 2007)
Mike Joffe, emeritus reader1, James Bennett, research associate1, Nicky Best, professor of statistics and epidemiology1, Tina Kold Jensen, professor of environmental epidemiology2
1 Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Imperial College, London W2 1PG , 2 University of Southern Denmark, Institute of Public Health, Denmark
Correspondence to: M Joffe m.joffe{at}imperial.ac.uk
Design Analysis of four large population surveys.
Setting Denmark and the United Kingdom.
Participants 49 506 pregnancies.
Main outcome measure Secondary sex ratio.
Results No association was found between the sex ratio and time to pregnancy and no discernible trend was found for sex ratio with time to pregnancy, either within individual datasets or in the pooled analysis. The odds ratios were 0.97 (95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.04) for contraceptive failures, 1.01 (0.96 to 1.05) for time to pregnancy of 2-4 months, 1.02 (0.97 to 1.08) for 5-10 months, 0.98 (0.93 to 1.03) for 11 months or more, and 0.88 (0.74 to 1.06) for fertility treatment, with 0-1 months as the reference category.
Conclusion No association was found between the secondary sex ratio and time to pregnancy.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses