Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2007;334:460 (3 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.39070.573032.80 (published 26 February 2007)
Philippa Howden-Chapman, professor and director1, Anna Matheson, PhD student1, Julian Crane, professor and codirector2, Helen Viggers, data analyst1, Malcolm Cunningham, principal analyst4, Tony Blakely, professor3, Chris Cunningham, professor5, Alistair Woodward, professor6, Kay Saville-Smith, director7, Des O'Dea, lecturer1, Martin Kennedy, adviser8, Michael Baker, senior lecturer and codirector1, Nick Waipara, scientist9, Ralph Chapman, associate professor10, Gabrielle Davie, biostatistician1
1 He Kainga Oranga, Housing and Health Research Programme, University of Otago, Wellington, PO Box 7343, Wellington South, New Zealand, 2 Department of Medicine, University of Otago, 3 Department of Public Health, University of Otago, 4 Building Research Association of New Zealand, Porirua City, New Zealand, 5 Research Centre for Maori Health and Development, Massey University, Wellington, 6 School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, 7 Centre for Research Evaluation and Social Assessment (CRESA), Wellington, 8 Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, 9 Landcare Research, Auckland, 10 School of Geography, Environment and Earth Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington
Correspondence to: P Howden-Chapman howdenc{at}wnmeds.ac.nz
Design Community based, cluster, single blinded randomised study.
Setting Seven low income communities in New Zealand.
Participants 1350 households containing 4407 participants.
Intervention Installation of a standard retrofit insulation package.
Main outcome measures Indoor temperature and relative humidity, energy consumption, self reported health, wheezing, days off school and work, visits to general practitioners, and admissions to hospital.
Results Insulation was associated with a small increase in bedroom temperatures during the winter (0.5°C) and decreased relative humidity (2.3%), despite energy consumption in insulated houses being 81% of that in uninsulated houses. Bedroom temperatures were below 10°C for 1.7 fewer hours each day in insulated homes than in uninsulated ones. These changes were associated with reduced odds in the insulated homes of fair or poor self rated health (adjusted odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.38 to 0.68), self reports of wheezing in the past three months (0.57, 0.47 to 0.70), self reports of children taking a day off school (0.49, 0.31 to 0.80), and self reports of adults taking a day off work (0.62, 0.46 to 0.83). Visits to general practitioners were less often reported by occupants of insulated homes (0.73, 0.62 to 0.87). Hospital admissions for respiratory conditions were also reduced (0.53, 0.22 to 1.29), but this reduction was not statistically significant (P=0.16).
Conclusion Insulating existing houses led to a significantly warmer, drier indoor environment and resulted in improved self rated health, self reported wheezing, days off school and work, and visits to general practitioners as well as a trend for fewer hospital admissions for respiratory conditions.
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses
Israeli students are refusing to perform intimate examinations on anaesthetised women without their informed consent.