BMJ  2007;334:362-365 (17 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.39064.457025.DE

Practice

Reduction of bloodstream infections associated with catheters in paediatric intensive care unit: stepwise approach

Adnan Bhutta, assistant professor1, Craig Gilliam, director of infection control2, Michele Honeycutt, infection control practitioner2, Stephen Schexnayder, professor1, Jerril Green, associate professor1, Michele Moss, professor1, K J S Anand, professor1

1 Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children's Hospital, 800 Marshall Street, Slot 512-3, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA , 2 Epidemiology and Infection Control, Arkansas Children's Hospital

Correspondence to: A Bhutta bhuttaadnant{at}uams.edu

Abstract

Problem Bloodstream infections associated with catheters were the most common nosocomial infections in one paediatric intensive care unit in 1994-7, with rates well above the national average.

Design Clinical data were collected prospectively to assess the rates of infection from 1994 onwards. The high rates in 1994-7 led to the stepwise introduction of interventions over a five year period. At quarterly intervals, prospective data continued to be collected during this period and an additional three year follow-up period.

Setting A 292 bed tertiary care children's hospital.

Key measures for improvement We aimed to reduce our infection rates to below the national mean rates for similar units by 2000 (a 25% reduction).

Strategies for change A stepwise introduction of interventions designed to reduce infection rates, including maximal barrier precautions, transition to antibiotic impregnated central venous catheters, annual handwashing campaigns, and changing the skin disinfectant from povidone-iodine to chlorhexidine.

Effects of change Significant decreases in rates of infection occurred over the intervention period. These were sustained over the three year follow-up. Annual rates decreased from 9.7/1000 days with a central venous catheter in 1997 to 3.0/1000 days in 2005, which translates to a relative risk reduction of 75% (95% confidence interval 35% to 126%), an absolute risk reduction of 6% (2% to 10%), and a number needed to treat of 16 (10 to 35).

Lessons learnt A stepwise introduction of interventions leading to a greater than threefold reduction in nosocomial infections can be implemented successfully. This requires a multidisciplinary team, support from hospital leadership, ongoing data collection, shared data interpretation, and introduction of evidence based interventions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Kollef, M. (2008). SMART Approaches for Reducing Nosocomial Infections in the ICU. Chest 134: 447-456 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Costello, J. M., Morrow, D. F., Graham, D. A., Potter-Bynoe, G., Sandora, T. J., Laussen, P. C. (2008). Systematic Intervention to Reduce Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection Rates in a Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Pediatrics 121: 915-923 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Practice not perfect
Rhys T Lewis
bmj.com, 18 Feb 2007 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ